首页> 外文期刊>Architectural Research Quarterly >Machines for living in: Connections and contrasts between designed architecture and the development of living forms
【24h】

Machines for living in: Connections and contrasts between designed architecture and the development of living forms

机译:居住机器:设计建筑与居住形式发展之间的联系和对比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The phrase 'machines for living in', quoted in the title of this piece, echoes the words of two French thinkers, widely separated in time. The first is the philosopher Rene Descartes, who described the human body as a machine for living in, the inhabiting entity being the mind that Descartes famously regarded as being a distinct and independent entity (Cartesian duality).1 The second is the architect Charles-Edouard Jeanneret-Gris ('Le Corbusier'), who described domestic buildings as machines for living in.2 Architecture has sometimes drawn inspiration from the proportions of already-formed bodies, an approach associated most famously with Vitruvius but, for most of history, consideration of the processes by which bodies and buildings are constructed has been the business of very different sets of people.
机译:在这篇文章的标题中引用了“居住的机器”一词,呼应了两位法国思想家的话,他们在时间上相距甚远。第一个是哲学家里内·笛卡尔(Rene Descartes),他将人体描述为一种生活的机器,居住的实体是笛卡尔著名地被视为独特而独立的实体(笛卡尔二元性)的思想。1第二个是建筑师查尔斯-爱德华·詹纳雷特·格里斯(“勒·柯布西耶”)将住宅建筑描述为居住机器。2建筑有时会从已经形成的物体的比例中汲取灵感,这种方法最著名的是维特鲁威斯,但在大多数历史上,构筑建筑物的过程一直是不同人群的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号