首页> 外文期刊>Archaeologies >Revisiting History’s Cenotaphs: The “Common Man” and Ethics of Commemoration in Conflict Archaeology
【24h】

Revisiting History’s Cenotaphs: The “Common Man” and Ethics of Commemoration in Conflict Archaeology

机译:回顾历史的纪念碑:冲突考古学中的“普通人”与纪念伦理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aphorism that victors write history routinely stirs up debate about the epistemic underpinnings of conflict histories. This is as true of analyses of the most publicized of modern wars as it is of studies of little documented conflicts in the distant past. Nowhere, however, are source discrepancies as tangible as in the records of resistance movements in feudal and colonial societies. Archaeologists working in such contexts thus have a chance to adopt the ‘common man’ as a subject of research not only to balance the record, as it were, but also on ethical grounds with a view towards commemoration.
机译:胜利者写历史的格言通常会激起有关冲突历史的认识论基础的争论。分析最广为人知的现代战争与研究遥远的过去很少有文献记载的冲突一样。然而,在封建社会和殖民社会的抵抗运动记录中,没有任何来源的差异如此明显。因此,在这种情况下工作的考古学家有机会采用“普通人”作为研究对象,不仅可以平衡记录,而且可以出于伦理目的,以纪念。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Archaeologies》 |2013年第1期|56-70|共15页
  • 作者

    Michael Bletzer;

  • 作者单位

    Four Corners Research Archaeological Consultants">(1);

    ">(2);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号