首页> 外文期刊>Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering >Modeling the Amplitude Mode of Piezoelectric Microcantilever AFM in Contrast to the Surface of the Sample in a Liquid Medium
【24h】

Modeling the Amplitude Mode of Piezoelectric Microcantilever AFM in Contrast to the Surface of the Sample in a Liquid Medium

机译:在液体介质中与样品表面形成对比的压电微悬臂AFM的振幅模式建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper deals with the modeling and simulation of the vibration behavior of piezoelectric microcantilever based on theTimoshenko theory and using multi-scale method in the liquid environment, considering the interaction forces in the liquidmedium. The effect of viscosity and density is investigated on first four bending modes. The results of topographic simulationfor rectangular roughness in the liquid medium and the amplitude mode indicate a reduction in the latency of the firstmode from 1.54 to 0.48 and in the second mode from 0.49 to 0.18 compared to the air environment. According to the resultsof simulation in different working environments, with the increase in the radius of the probe tip, the squeeze force of theliquid will also increase; this increase in the force reduces the amplitude of the vibration motion and the natural frequency.According to the results of the simulation, solution based on the theory of string of spheres with 0.1% error has less accuracythan on multi-scale method with 0.031% error. Regarding the multi-scale method, the Rankl model with a percentage errorof 13.47 and the string of sphere model with a percentage error of 0.10 have had a higher accuracy than the similar modelof FEM with 14.64% error; the accuracy of the Hosaka model with a percentage error of 18.62 is less than the Rankl model;therefore, the Rankl model has the least error for multi-scale method solving in Timoshenko beam theory.
机译:本文考虑了液体介质中的相互作用力,基于Timoshenko理论并在液体环境中使用多尺度方法对压电微悬臂梁的振动行为进行了建模和仿真。研究了粘度和密度对前四个弯曲模式的影响。与空气环境相比,液体介质和振幅模式中矩形粗糙度的地形模拟结果表明,第一模式的等待时间从1.54降低到0.48,第二模式的等待时间从0.49降低到0.18。根据不同工作环境下的仿真结果,随着探头尖端半径的增大,液体的挤压力也随之增大。根据仿真结果,基于球串理论的误差为0.1%的解决方案的精度要低于采用0.031%误差的多尺度方法的精度。 。关于多尺度方法,百分数误差为13.47的Rankl模型和百分数误差为0.10的球串模型的精度要高于类似的FEM模型,误差为14.64%。误差为18.62的Hosaka模型的精度低于Rankl模型;因此,Timoshenko梁理论中的Rankl模型在多尺度方法求解中具有最小的误差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号