...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback >Biofeedback Treatment for Functional Anorectal Disorders: A Comprehensive Efficacy Review
【24h】

Biofeedback Treatment for Functional Anorectal Disorders: A Comprehensive Efficacy Review

机译:功能性肛门直肠疾病的生物反馈治疗:全面的疗效审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This review aimed to critically evaluate the literature on the efficacy of biofeedback for functional anorectal disorders, rate these biofeedback applications according to established guidelines, and make recommendations for this field based on the literature. The Medline and PsychInfo databases were searched to obtain all papers published from 1975 to 2003 that included the terms "biofeedback" and either "constipation" "pelvic floor dyssynergia" "fecal incontinence" or "anorectal pain." Adult and pediatric papers in any language were screened. Prospective studies with five or more participants and a description of the treatment protocol and outcome were selected for review. Seventy-four studies qualified for review: 33 trials on fecal incontinence (FI), 38 on pelvic floor dyssynergia (PFD) or functional constipation, and 3 on anorectal pain. Only 20% of studies were controlled outcome trials. Treatment protocols, etiological subgroups studied and outcome measures varied greatly. The overall average probability of successful treatment outcome for patients treated with biofeedback was 67.2% for functional FI and 62.4% for constipation. There were insufficient data to warrant such calculation for anorectal pain. According to standard efficacy rating criteria, biofeedback treatment is efficacious for functional constipation or PFD in children and probably efficacious in adults; probably efficacious for functional FI; and possibly efficacious for anorectal pain. Utilizing data from all applicable studies, we found that success rate per subject is significantly higher for biofeedback treatment than for standard medical care for PFD/functional constipation, and FI (p < .001 for both). Biofeedback treatment may therefore be viewed as a valuable adjunct to medical management of functional PFD/constipation and incontinence. A number of recommendations for future investigations are made based on the review.
机译:这篇综述旨在严格评估有关生物反馈治疗功能性肛肠疾病的文献,根据既定指南对这些生物反馈应用进行评分,并根据文献对该领域提出建议。搜索Medline和PsychInfo数据库以获得1975年至2003年发表的所有论文,其中包括术语“生物反馈”和“便秘”,“骨盆底神经痛”,“大便失禁”或“肛门直肠疼痛”。筛选了任何语言的成人和儿童论文。选择具有五个或更多参与者的前瞻性研究以及对治疗方案和结果的描述进行审查。共有74项研究可供审查:33项关于大便失禁(FI)的试验,38项关于骨盆底运动障碍(PFD)或功能性便秘的试验,以及3项关于肛门直肠疼痛的试验。只有20%的研究是对照结果试验。治疗方案,病因学亚组和结局指标差异很大。经生物反馈治疗的患者,功能性FI成功总体治疗成功的平均概率为67.2%,便秘患者为62.4%。没有足够的数据来进行肛门直肠疼痛的计算。根据标准功效评估标准,生物反馈治疗对儿童的功能性便秘或PFD有效,对成人有效。可能对功能性FI有效可能对肛门直肠疼痛有效。利用所有适用研究的数据,我们发现,对于PFD /功能性便秘和FI,生物反馈治疗的每位受试者成功率均显着高于标准医学护理(两者均P <0.001)。因此,生物反馈治疗可以被视为功能性PFD /便秘和失禁的医学管理的有价值的辅助手段。在审查的基础上,提出了一些建议,供将来进行调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号