首页> 外文期刊>Applied Mathematical Modelling >Developing optimization & robust models for a mixed-model assembly line balancing problem with semi-automated operations
【24h】

Developing optimization & robust models for a mixed-model assembly line balancing problem with semi-automated operations

机译:用半自动操作开发混合模型装配线平衡问题的优化和强大模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, we present two new mathematical models for mixed-model assembly line balancing. The line is semi-automated and characterized by various alternative formats for the operations performed, which range from human operators and assisting robots to robotics solutions, where the operators may have different skill levels and operators on adjacent stations may cooperate. Given the cycle time, the first model minimizes the fixed and variable costs associated with setting up the assembly line. However, the second mathematical model involves a cycle time, which is variable and it changes between a lower bound and an upper bound. These bounds reflect the expected future changes in demand. The objective is to minimize both the costs and the cycle time. To obtain more accurate and reliable results, we present a robust solution for the different confidence levels (alpha) determined by managers. To verify the mathematical models, we considered different test problems and compared the robust solutions under three different conditions. The results showed that the robust modeling approach obtains a more reliable design than the traditional cost trade-off alone. The model allows decision makers to select assembly operations based on a better understanding of their decision impacts in both the short term and long term under conditions of demand uncertainty. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在这项研究中,我们为混合模型装配线平衡提供了两个新的数学模型。该线是半自动化的,其特征在于执行的各种替代格式,用于执行的操作,该操作范围从人类运营商和辅助机器人到机器人解决方案,其中操作者可以具有相邻站的不同的技能水平和操作员可以协作。鉴于循环时间,第一个模型最小化与设置装配线相关联的固定和可变成本。然而,第二数学模型涉及一个循环时间,其是可变的,并且它在下限和上限之间变化。这些界限反映了预期的需求变化。目标是最大限度地减少成本和循环时间。为了获得更准确和可靠的结果,我们为由经理确定的不同置信水平(alpha)提供了一种强大的解决方案。为了验证数学模型,我们考虑了不同的测试问题,并比较了三种不同条件下的强大解决方案。结果表明,稳健的建模方法比传统的成本折衷单独获得更可靠的设计。该模型允许决策者根据在需求不确定性条件下更好地了解其在短期和长期决策影响。 (c)2019 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号