首页> 外文期刊>Applied economics letters >Majority voting and Gini-based social welfare: testing the hypothesis of symmetry
【24h】

Majority voting and Gini-based social welfare: testing the hypothesis of symmetry

机译:多数投票和基于基尼的社会福利:检验对称性假设

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Majority voting accords with the class of social evaluation functions consistent with the Gini coefficient when income distributions are symmetric under a rank-dependent transformation (Rodriguez and Salas, 2014). Under this assumption, median income and the equally distributed equivalent income are the same, and the Gini coefficient is an affine function of the median-mean ratio. Despite the importance of these findings, the empirical plausibility of the symmetry hypothesis has not been tested yet. In this article, we contrast the symmetry assumption with an empirical exercise based on the Survey on Income and Living Conditions data set for the European Union in the period 2005-2007. We find that the symmetric condition is generally fulfilled.
机译:当收入分配在等级依赖的转换下对称时,多数投票符合与基尼系数一致的社会评价函数类别(Rodriguez and Salas,2014)。在此假设下,中位数收入和平均分配的等值收入是相同的,基尼系数是中位数均值比的仿射函数。尽管这些发现很重要,但对称假设的经验似然性尚未得到检验。在本文中,我们将对称假设与基于2005-2007年欧洲联盟收入和生活条件调查数据集的经验研究进行对比。我们发现对称条件通常可以满足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号