首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Technoeconomic analysis of internal combustion engine - organic Rankine cycle systems for combined heat and power in energy-intensive buildings
【24h】

Technoeconomic analysis of internal combustion engine - organic Rankine cycle systems for combined heat and power in energy-intensive buildings

机译:内燃发动机的技术经济分析-用于能源密集型建筑物中热电联产的有机朗肯循环系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For buildings with low heat-to-power demand ratios, the installation of internal combustion engines (ICEs) for the onsite provision of combined heat and power (CHP) results in large amounts of surplus heat. In the UK, such installations risk being ineligible for the CHP Quality Assurance (CHPQA) programme, thereby incurring additional levies. In this work, a technoeconomic optimisation of small-scale organic Rankine cycle (ORC) engines is performed, in which the ORC engines recover heat from the ICE exhaust gases in order to increase the overall efficiency of this combined solution and meet the CHPQA requirements. Two competing system configurations are assessed. In the first, the ORC engine also recovers heat from the CHP-ICE jacket water to generate additional power. In the second, the ORC engine operates at a higher condensing temperature, which prohibits jacket-water heat recovery but allows heat from the condenser to be delivered to the building. When optimised for minimum specific investment cost, the first configuration is initially found to deliver 20% more power (25.8 kW) at design conditions, and a minimum specific investment cost (1600 pound/kW) that is 8% lower than the second configuration. However, the first configuration leads to less heat from the CHP-ICE being supplied to the building, increasing the cost of meeting the heat demand. By establishing part-load performance curves for both the CHP-ICE and ORC engines, the economic benefits from realistic operation can be evaluated. The present study goes beyond previous work by testing the configurations against a comprehensive database of real historical electricity and heating demand for thirty energy-intensive buildings at half-hour resolution. The discounted payback period for the second configuration is found to lie between 3.5 and 7.5 years for all of the buildings considered, while the first configuration is seen to recoup capital investment costs for only 23% of the buildings. The broad applicability of the second configuration offers attractive opportunities to increase manufacturing volumes and reduce unit costs. The findings are relevant to a range of buildings with heat-to-power demand ratios from 20% to 100%.
机译:对于具有低热电需求比的建筑物,安装用于现场提供热电联产(CHP)的内燃机(ICE)会产生大量的余热。在英国,此类装置可能不符合CHP质量保证(CHPQA)计划的资格,从而产生了额外的征费。在这项工作中,对小型有机朗肯循环(ORC)发动机进行了技术经济优化,其中ORC发动机从ICE废气中回收热量,以提高此组合解决方案的整体效率并满足CHPQA要求。评估了两个竞争的系统配置。首先,ORC发动机还从CHP-ICE夹套水中回收热量以产生额外的动力。第二,ORC发动机在更高的冷凝温度下运行,这阻止了夹套水的热回收,但允许来自冷凝器的热量传递到建筑物。当针对最低特定投资成本进行优化时,最初发现第一种配置在设计条件下可提供20%的功率(25.8 kW)以上,而最低特定投资成本(1600磅/ kW)比第二种配置低8%。但是,第一种配置导致将来自CHP-ICE的热量减少提供给建筑物,从而增加了满足热量需求的成本。通过为CHP-ICE和ORC发动机建立部分负荷性能曲线,可以评估实际操作的经济效益。本研究超越了以前的工作,通过以30小时的分辨率在30个高能耗建筑的真实历史电力和供热需求的综合数据库中对配置进行了测试。对于所考虑的所有建筑物,第二种配置的折现投资回收期被发现在3.5年至7.5年之间,而第一种配置的回收期仅占23%的建筑物的资本投资成本。第二种配置的广泛适用性为增加制造量和降低单位成本提供了诱人的机会。这些发现与热电需求比率从20%到100%的一系列建筑物有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号