首页> 外文期刊>Aphasiology >How does linguistic knowledge contribute to short-term memory? Contrasting effects of impaired semantic knowledge and executive control
【24h】

How does linguistic knowledge contribute to short-term memory? Contrasting effects of impaired semantic knowledge and executive control

机译:语言知识如何促进短期记忆?语义知识和执行控制受损的对比效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Linguistic knowledge makes an important contribution to verbal STM. Some theories, including Baddeley's original conception of the episodic buffer, hold that harnessing linguistic knowledge to support STM is executively demanding. However, some recent evidence suggests that the linguistic contribution does not depend on executive resources. Aims: In this study we tested the hypothesis that activation of language representations is automatic and that executive control is most important when the material to be remembered is incompatible with this automatic activation. Methods & Procedures: Word list recall was tested in three patients with transcortical sensory aphasia (TSA) following stroke. All had preserved word repetition and digit span but poor comprehension associated with impaired executive control. They were compared with two semantic dementia (SD) patients with degraded semantic representations but intact executive control. Patients repeated word lists that varied in their semantic and syntactic resemblance to meaningful sentences. Outcomes & Results: The executively impaired TSA patients showed large benefits of semantic and syntactic structure, indicating that their executive deficits did not interfere with the normal linguistic contribution to STM. Instead they showed severe deficits in repetition of scrambled word lists that did not follow usual syntactic rules. On these, the patients changed the word order to better fit their existing knowledge of syntactic structure. In contrast, the SD patients had no problems repeating words in unusual sequences but their semantic knowledge degradation led to frequent phonological errors due to a loss of “semantic binding”, the process by which semantic knowledge of words helps to constrain their phonological representation. Conclusions: These findings suggest that linguistic support for STM consists of (a) automatic activation of semantic and syntactic knowledge and (b) executive processes that inhibit this activation when it is incompatible with the material to be remembered.View full textDownload full textKeywordsShort-term memory, Semantic knowledge, Syntax, Executive control, Sentence repetitionRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.581798
机译:背景:语言知识为口头STM做出了重要贡献。一些理论,包括Baddeley最初对情节缓冲的概念,都认为利用语言知识来支持STM的执行要求很高。但是,最近的一些证据表明,语言贡献不依赖于行政资源。目的:在这项研究中,我们测试了以下假设:语言表示激活是自动的,当要记住的材料与此自动激活不兼容时,执行控制是最重要的。方法和步骤:对三名卒中后经皮感觉性失语症(TSA)的患者进行单词列表回忆测试。所有人都保留了单词重复和数字跨度,但与执行力控制受损相关的理解力很差。将他们与两名语义退化但具有完整执行控制的语义痴呆(SD)患者进行了比较。患者重复的单词表在语义和句法上都类似于有意义的句子。结果与结果:执行受损的TSA患者显示出语义和句法结构的巨大好处,表明他们的执行缺陷并不干扰STM的正常语言贡献。相反,他们在不遵循常规句法规则的重复加扰单词列表中显示出严重的缺陷。在这些内容上,患者更改了单词顺序以更好地适应他们现有的句法结构知识。相比之下,SD患者在按异常顺序重复单词时没有问题,但由于失去了“语义绑定”,语义知识的退化导致了频繁的语音错误,在这种过程中,单词的语义知识有助于约束他们的语音表示。结论:这些发现表明,对STM的语言支持包括(a)语义和句法知识的自动激活,以及(b)当与要记住的材料不兼容时抑制这种激活的执行过程。查看全文下载全文关键字短期内存,语义知识,语法,执行控制,句子重复,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.581798

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号