首页> 外文期刊>Antipode >Agricultural Justice, Abnormal Justice? An Analysis of Fair Trade's Plantation Problem
【24h】

Agricultural Justice, Abnormal Justice? An Analysis of Fair Trade's Plantation Problem

机译:农业正义,反常正义?公平贸易的种植园问题分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A debate has arisen in the fair trade community regarding the certification of plantation crops. On one side of this debate is Fair Trade USA, which supports plantation certification. On the other is the retailer Equal Exchange, whose leaders fear that fair trade's longstanding commitment to small farmer cooperatives may be in jeopardy. Drawing on the two organizations' experiences with tea plantations and cooperatives in Darjeeling, India, as well as my own ethnographic research, I explore how advocates in the global North identify who counts as a legitimate laboring subject of agricultural justice. This debate underscores that social justice in global agriculture is fundamentally multiplein Nancy Fraser's terms, abnormal. The seeming intractability of this debate shows that while the agricultural justice movement has attended to questions of economic distribution and cultural recognition, it must do more to address problems of political representation at national and international scales.
机译:公平贸易界就种植作物的认证引起了争论。这场辩论的一方面是美国公平贸易,它支持种植园认证。另一方面是零售商平等交易所,其领导人担心公平贸易对小农合作社的长期承诺可能会受到威胁。借鉴这两个组织在印度大吉岭的茶园和合作社的经验,以及我自己的人种学研究,我探索了全球北部的倡导者如何确定谁被视为农业正义的合法劳动主体。这场辩论强调,在南希·弗雷泽(Nancy Fraser)的说法中,全球农业中的社会正义从根本上是多重的,这是异常的。这场辩论似乎难以解决,这表明尽管农业正义运动处理了经济分配和文化认可的问题,但它必须在解决国家和国际规模的政治代表性问题上做更多的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号