...
首页> 外文期刊>Anthropological Quarterly >Blurring Boundaries: Recognizing Knowledge-Practices in the Study of Social Movements
【24h】

Blurring Boundaries: Recognizing Knowledge-Practices in the Study of Social Movements

机译:模糊的边界:在社会运动研究中认识知识实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Social movements are arising in unexpected places, producing effects not normally associated with our traditional understandings of either politics or movements. No longer, and perhaps never, solely the highly visible, modernist expressions of resistance to the state, movements are not only enacting politics through protest and cultural contestation, but are generating diverse knowledges. From heated debates over the meaning of Italy's alter-globalization movement; to careful direct-action strategizing in Chicago's cooperative bookstores; to conferences on Native American environmental justice issues, contemporary movements are important sites of knowledge creation, reformulation and diffusion. We call these "knowledge-practices." Building on interdisciplinary approaches to the study of social movements, we argue that when we recognize movements as processes through which knowledge is generated, modified and mobilized, we gain important insights into the politics of contemporary movements. This recognition also has important methodological implications. It requires that we shift the mode of engagement in our research, blurring established social scientific boundaries and promoting a more relational-symmetrical approach. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:社会运动发生在意想不到的地方,产生的影响通常与我们对政治或运动的传统理解通常不相关。运动不再是,或者永远不是唯一的,高度可见的,对国家抵抗的现代主义表达,运动不仅通过抗议和文化竞赛来制定政治,而且还产生了各种各样的知识。来自对意大利改变全球化运动含义的激烈辩论;仔细考虑芝加哥合作书店的直接行动策略;在有关美洲原住民环境正义问题的会议上,当代运动是知识创造,重新制定和传播的重要场所。我们称这些为“知识实践”。基于跨学科的社会运动研究方法,我们认为,当我们认识到运动是产生,修改和动员知识的过程时,就会获得对当代运动政治的重要见解。这种认可也具有重要的方法论意义。它要求我们改变参与研究的方式,模糊既定的社会科学界限,并提倡一种更加关系对称的方法。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号