...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences >Systematic Approach to Evaluating Trade-Offs among Fuel Options: The Lessons of MTBE
【24h】

Systematic Approach to Evaluating Trade-Offs among Fuel Options: The Lessons of MTBE

机译:评估燃油选择权衡的系统方法:MTBE的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The fuel additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) has been used in an effort to improve air quality in the United States, but other undesirable effects, particularly the contamination of water resources, were eventually judged to outweigh any air quality benefits it may have offered. The experience with MTBE offers many lessons, including the need to evaluate potential positive and negative environmental impacts associated with fuel choices using a comprehensive approach that combines a product life-cycle perspective with the risk assessment paradigm. Such an approach, referred to as "comprehensive environmental assessment" (CEA), is illustrated here by highlighting some of the issues that might be considered in evaluating reformulated gasoline (RFG) produced with MTBE, ethanol, or no oxygenate.
机译:燃料添加剂甲基叔丁基醚(MTBE)一直用于改善美国的空气质量,但最终被认为其他不利影响,尤其是水资源污染,超过了它可能提供的任何空气质量收益。 MTBE的经验提供了许多经验教训,包括需要使用一种综合方法来评估与燃料选择相关的潜在正面和负面环境影响,该综合方法将产品生命周期的观点与风险评估范式相结合。通过强调在评估由MTBE,乙醇或无氧化合物生产的重整汽油(RFG)时可能要考虑的一些问题,来说明这种方法,称为“综合环境评估”(CEA)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号