首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences >Color consilience: color through the lens of art practice, history, philosophy, and neuroscience
【24h】

Color consilience: color through the lens of art practice, history, philosophy, and neuroscience

机译:色彩一致性:从艺术实践,历史,哲学和神经科学的角度看色彩

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Paintings can be interpreted as the product of the complex neural machinery that translates physical light signals into behavior, experience, and emotion. The brain mechanisms responsible for vision and perception have been sculpted during evolution and further modified by cultural exposure and development. By closely examining artists' paintings and practices, we can discover hints to how the brain works, and achieve insight into the discoveries and inventions of artists and their impact on culture. Here, I focus on an integral aspect of color, color contrast, which poses a challenge for artists: a mark situated on an otherwise blank canvas will appear a different color in the context of the finished painting. How do artists account for this change in color during the production of a painting? In the broader context of neural and philosophical considerations of color, I discuss the practices of three modern masters, Henri Matisse, Paul Cezanne, and Claude Monet, and suggest that the strategies they developed not only capitalized on the neural mechanisms of color, but also influenced the trajectory of western art history.
机译:绘画可以解释为复杂的神经机制的产物,它将物理光信号转化为行为,经验和情感。负责视觉和知觉的大脑机制已在进化过程中进行了雕刻,并通过文化接触和发展得到了进一步的修改。通过仔细检查艺术家的绘画和实践,我们可以发现大脑运作方式的提示,并深入了解艺术家的发现和发明及其对文化的影响。在这里,我将重点放在色彩的整体方面,即色彩对比,这对艺术家构成了挑战:位于空白画布上的标记在完成的绘画中会呈现出不同的颜色。在绘画过程中,艺术家如何解释这种颜色变化?在更广泛的关于颜色的神经和哲学思考的背景下,我讨论了三个现代大师Henri Matisse,Paul Cezanne和Claude Monet的实践,并建议他们制定的策略不仅利用了颜色的神经机制,而且还利用了影响了西方艺术史的轨迹。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号