首页> 外文期刊>Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry >Comparison of two different solvents employed for pressurised fluid extraction of stevioside from Stevia rebaudiana: methanol versus water
【24h】

Comparison of two different solvents employed for pressurised fluid extraction of stevioside from Stevia rebaudiana: methanol versus water

机译:从甜叶菊中提取甜菊糖的两种不同溶剂的比较:甲醇与水

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pressurised fluid extraction using water or methanol was employed for the extraction of stevioside from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. The extraction method was optimised in terms of temperature and duration of the static or the dynamic step. Extracts were analysed by liquid chromatography followed by UV and mass-spectrometric (MS) detections. Thermal degradation of stevioside was the same in both solvents within the range 70–160 °C. Methanol showed better extraction ability for isolation of stevioside from Stevia rebaudiana leaves than water within the range 110–160 °C. However, water represents the green alternative to methanol. The limit of detection of stevioside in the extract analysed was 30 ng for UV detection and 2 ng for MS detection.
机译:使用水或甲醇的加压流体提取从甜叶菊中提取甜菊糖苷。在温度和静态或动态步骤的持续时间方面优化了提取方法。提取物通过液相色谱法进行分析,然后进行UV和质谱(MS)检测。在70–160°C范围内,两种溶剂中甜菊糖苷的热降解率均相同。在110-160°C的温度范围内,甲醇显示出比甜叶菊的甜叶菊苷更好的提取能力。但是,水是甲醇的绿色替代品。经分析的提取物中甜菊糖苷的检出限对于UV检测为30 ng,对于MS检测为2 ng。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号