...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene >Efficacy of Waterless Hand Hygiene Compared with Handwashing with Soap: A Field Study in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
【24h】

Efficacy of Waterless Hand Hygiene Compared with Handwashing with Soap: A Field Study in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

机译:无水手卫生与肥皂洗手的功效:坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的实地研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Effective handwashing with soap requires reliable access to water supplies. However, more than three billion persons do not have household-level access to piped water. This research addresses the challenge of improving hand hygiene within water-constrained environments. The antimicrobial efficacy of alcohol-based hand sanitizer, a waterless hand hygiene product, was evaluated and compared with handwashing with soap and water in field conditions in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Hand sanitizer use by mothers resulted in 0.66 and 0.64 log reductions per hand of Escherichia coli and fecal streptococci, respectively. In comparison, handwashing with soap resulted in 0.50 and 0.25 log reductions per hand of E. coli and fecal streptococci, respectively. Hand sanitizer was significantly better than handwashing with respect to reduction in levels of fecal streptococci (P = 0.01). The feasibility and health impacts of promoting hand sanitizer as an alternative hand hygiene option for water-constrained environments should be assessed.
机译:要用肥皂有效地洗手,必须可靠地使用 供水。但是,超过30亿人没有 在家庭一级获得自来水。这项研究 解决了在水受限的 环境中改善手卫生的挑战。评价了酒精性洗手液(一种无水的手卫生产品)的抗微生物功效,并与在田间条件下用肥皂和水洗手的情况进行了比较( 在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆。母亲使用洗手液分别导致每只大肠杆菌和粪便链球菌的对数减少量分别为0.66和0.64。相比之下,用肥皂洗手分别会使大肠杆菌和粪便链球菌每只手分别减少0.50和0.25 log。就减少粪便链球菌的含量而言,洗手液 明显优于洗手液(P = 0.01)。应评估 在水受限的环境中作为替代 手卫生选项的可行性和健康影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号