首页> 外文期刊>The American Midland Naturalist >Land-use Impacts on Watershed Health and Integrity in Indiana Warmwater Streams
【24h】

Land-use Impacts on Watershed Health and Integrity in Indiana Warmwater Streams

机译:土地使用对印第安纳州温水河流域流域健康和完整性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many warmwater streams in the midwestern United States have been negatively influenced by human land-use practices. From Jun. through Aug. 2002 and 2003, tributaries (n = 50) of the upper Wabash River basin, Indiana, were sampled to investigate ecosystem health and integrity. Stream fish and macroinvertebrates were sampled along with in-stream habitat according to National Water-Quality Assessment Program protocols to examine relationships among fish community structure, benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages, physical-habitat complexity and water chemistry under varying land-use practices. Stream fish abundance was best explained by in-stream habitat quality (QHEI), watershed area and the amount of forested land use upstream of each sampling site. Overall index of biotic integrity (IBI) scores were low (mean = 35.58; range, 20 to 52), and varied predictably by riparian land-use type. The abundance of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa was best explained by the substrate QHEI metric (λ = 0.24; P = 0.005). Macroinvertebrate community index (ICI) scores showed more variability than IBI scores (mean = 20.40; range, 0 to 36). In-stream habitat quality (QHEI) was directly related to riparian land-use practices. Forested sites had higher QHEI scores than fallow field and agricultural sites due to increased habitat heterogeneity, large-woody debris loading and larger substrate sizes. The best model for predicting IBI scores incorporated both watershed and reach-scale variables combining slope and erosion power with maximum depth, percent canopy closure, percent fine substrates, degree of channelization and LWDI (r^sup 2^ = 0.24; adjr^sup 2^ = 0.19). Reach-scale variables (i.e., QHEI score, stream width, the proportion of unstable banks and percent fine substrates) best predicted ICI scores (r^sup 2^ = 0.69; adjr^sup 2^ = 0.66). Based on these results, we recommend that resource managers incorporate both biotic and abiotic factors at various temporal and spatial scales to predict the effects of land-use practices on community health in agriculturally dominated, warmwater streams. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:美国中西部的许多温水溪流受到人类土地使用习惯的负面影响。从2002年6月至2003年8月,对印第安纳州瓦巴什河上游流域的支流(n = 50)进行了采样,以调查生态系统的健康和完整性。根据国家水质评估计划协议,对溪流鱼类和大型无脊椎动物以及溪流栖息地进行了采样,以检查在不同土地利用方式下鱼类群落结构,底栖大型无脊椎动物组合,栖息地复杂性和水化学之间的关系。溪流鱼类的丰度最好用溪流栖息地质量(QHEI),流域面积和每个采样点上游的林地使用量来解释。生物完整性的整体指数(IBI)得分较低(平均值= 35.58;范围从20到52),并且根据河岸土地利用类型的不同可以预测。底栖大型无脊椎动物类群的丰度可以通过底物QHEI指标得到最好的解释(λ= 0.24; P = 0.005)。大型无脊椎动物群落指数(ICI)得分比IBI得分表现出更大的变异性(平均值= 20.40;范围从0到36)。河内栖息地质量(QHEI)与河岸土地使用方式直接相关。由于生境的异质性增加,木屑碎片的增加和基质尺寸的增加,林场的QHEI得分高于休耕场和农业场。预测IBI分数的最佳模型结合了分水岭和范围尺度变量,将坡度和侵蚀力与最大深度,冠层封闭百分比,精细基质百分比,渠道化程度和LWDI结合起来(r ^ sup 2 ^ = 0.24; adjr ^ sup 2 ^ = 0.19)。到达尺度变量(即QHEI分数,溪流宽度,不稳定堤岸的比例和精细基质的百分比)是最佳预测ICI分数(r ^ sup 2 ^ = 0.69; adjr ^ sup 2 ^ = 0.66)。根据这些结果,我们建议资源管理者在不同的时空尺度上纳入生物和非生物因素,以预测土地使用方式对农业为主的温水流对社区健康的影响。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《The American Midland Naturalist》 |2009年第1期|p.76-95|共20页
  • 作者

    Thomas P Simon;

  • 作者单位

    PETER J. HRODEY,2 TRENT M. SUTTON1 and EMMANUEL A. FRIMPONG3Purdue University, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, 1 95 Marsteller Street, West Lafayette,Indiana 47907ANDTHOMAS P. SIMONU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington Field Office, 620 South Walker Street, Indiana 474031 Corresponding author: University of Alaska Fairbanks, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, 207C O'Neill P.O. Box 757220, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, Telephone: (907) 474-7285, FAX: (907) 474-7204, email: tsutton@sfos.uaf.edu2 Present address: U.S. Fish Present address: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Stockton Fish and Wildlife Office, 4001 N. Wilson Way, Stockton, California 952053 Present address: Departmer 'Present address: Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic & State University, 100 Cheatham Hall, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号