首页> 外文期刊>AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY >Tumor-specific but not nonspecific cell-free circulating DNA can be used to monitor disease response in lymphoma?
【24h】

Tumor-specific but not nonspecific cell-free circulating DNA can be used to monitor disease response in lymphoma?

机译:肿瘤特异性而非非特异性的无细胞循环DNA可用于监测淋巴瘤的疾病反应?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recently, nontumor specific circulating DNA was shown to be elevated in a broad range of lymphomas, implicating a role as a potential biomarker. Epstein-Barr virus' (EBV) presence within a proportion of lymphomas implies EBV-DNA has potential as a lymphoma-specific disease response biomarker. However, application would be restricted to EBV-associated lymphomas. Neither detailed comparison has been performed of lymphoma-specific versus nonspecific DNA as disease response biomarkers nor have the kinetics of circulating DNA during treatment been established, and the optimal methodology remains unknown. We prospectively evaluated DNA levels and clinical response of 63 lymphoma patients. DNA was measured in paired serum, plasma, and cell samples at five predetermined time-points taken prior, during and following treatment. Both cell-free (c-f) circulating EBV-DNA (in EBV-associated lymphoma) and nonspecific c-f DNA levels (in all lymphomas) were elevated and discriminatory at presentation compared to healthy controls. Nonspecific c-f DNA was significantly associated with baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase. Within EBV-associated lymphomas at presentation, there was a strong correlation between specific and nonspecific circulating c-f DNA (r = 0.9, P < 0.0001). However, only c-f EBV-DNA correlated with clinical/radiological response. In addition, c-f EBV-DNA, and not nonspecific c-f DNA, provided an early marker of relapsed and refractory disease. Serum versus plasma, and single versus multiple-copy EBV-gene targets were equivalent. Lymphoma-specific DNA is a disease response biomarker; however, nonspecific DNA reflected neither lymphoma-specific DNA nor therapeutic response. Lymphoma disease response can be monitored by blood tests, but new lymphoma-specific biomarkers need to be identified to broaden applicability. Am. J. Hematol. 2012. ? 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:最近,在多种淋巴瘤中,非肿瘤特异性循环DNA被证明升高,这暗示了其作为潜在的生物标记物的作用。一部分淋巴瘤中存在爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV),这表明EBV-DNA具有作为淋巴瘤特异性疾病反应生物标记物的潜力。但是,该应用将仅限于与EBV相关的淋巴瘤。既没有针对作为疾病反应生物标志物的淋巴瘤特异DNA与非特异DNA进行过详细的比较,也未确定治疗过程中循环DNA的动力学,因此最佳方法仍未知。我们前瞻性评估了63名淋巴瘤患者的DNA水平和临床反应。在治疗前,治疗中和治疗后的五个预定时间点,在配对的血清,血浆和细胞样品中测量DNA。与健康对照组相比,无细胞(c-f)循环EBV-DNA(在与EBV相关的淋巴瘤中)和非特异性c-f DNA水平(在所有淋巴瘤中)均升高且具有歧视性。非特异性c-f DNA与基线血清乳酸脱氢酶显着相关。在与EBV相关的淋巴瘤出现时,特异性和非特异性循环c-f DNA之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.9,P <0.0001)。但是,只有c-f EBV-DNA与临床/放射学反应相关。此外,c-f EBV-DNA而非非特异性c-f DNA提供了复发和难治性疾病的早期标志。血清与血浆,单拷贝与多拷贝EBV基因靶标相当。淋巴瘤特异性DNA是疾病反应的生物标记;然而,非特异性DNA既不反映淋巴瘤特异性DNA,也不反映治疗反应。淋巴瘤疾病的反应可以通过血液测试进行监测,但是需要确定新的淋巴瘤特异性生物标志物以扩大适用性。上午。 J. Hematol。 2012。 2011年Wiley Periodicals,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号