...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >Application of a Repeat-Measure Biomarker Measurement Error Model to 2 Validation Studies: Examination of the Effect of Within-Person Variation in Biomarker Measurements
【24h】

Application of a Repeat-Measure Biomarker Measurement Error Model to 2 Validation Studies: Examination of the Effect of Within-Person Variation in Biomarker Measurements

机译:重复测量生物标志物测量误差模型在2项验证研究中的应用:检验内部变异对生物标志物测量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Repeat-biomarker measurement error models accounting for systematic correlated within-person error can benused to estimate the correlation coefficient (q) and deattenuation factor (k), used in measurement error correction.nThese models account for correlated errors in the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and the 24-hour diet recallnand random within-person variation in the biomarkers. Failure to account for within-person variation in biomarkersncan exaggerate correlated errors between FFQs and 24-hour diet recalls. For 2 validation studies, q and k werencalculated for total energy and protein density. In the Automated Multiple-Pass Method Validation Study (n ¼ 471),ndoubly labeled water (DLW) and urinary nitrogen (UN) were measured twice in 52 adults approximately 16 monthsnapart (2002–2003), yielding intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.43 for energy (DLW) and 0.54 for protein densityn(UN/DLW). The deattenuated correlation coefficient for protein density was 0.51 for correlation between the FFQnand the 24-hour diet recall and 0.49 for correlation between the FFQ and the biomarker. Use of repeat-biomarkernmeasurement error models resulted in a q of 0.42. These models were similarly applied to the Observing Proteinnand Energy Nutrition Study (1999–2000). In conclusion, within-person variation in biomarkers can be substantial,nand to adequately assess the impact of correlated subject-specific error, this variation should be assessed innvalidation studies of FFQs.
机译:可以使用重复生物标志物测量误差模型来解释系统内相关的人为误差,以估计用于校正测量误差的相关系数(q)和减量因子(k)。n这些模型解决了食品频率调查表(FFQ)中的相关误差。 )和24小时饮食回想以及生物标记物在人内的随机变化。未能说明人体内生物标志物的差异会夸大FFQ与24小时饮食回收之间的相关误差。对于2个验证研究,不计算q和k的总能量和蛋白质密度。在自动多次通过方法验证研究中(n 471),在前后16个月(2002年至2003年)之间对52名成年人进行了两次标记水(DLW)和尿氮(UN)的两次测量,得出能量的类内相关系数为0.43 (DLW),蛋白质密度n(UN / DLW)为0.54。 FFQn和24小时饮食召回之间的相关性的蛋白质密度的衰减相关系数为0.51,FFQ和生物标记之间的相关性的相关系数为0.49。使用重复生物标志物测量误差模型得出的q为0.42。这些模型类似地应用于观察蛋白和能量营养研究(1999–2000)。总之,人体内生物标志物的变化可能是巨大的,并且为了充分评估相关的受试者特异性错误的影响,应当对这种变化进行评估,以免除FFQ的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号