...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of enology & viticulture >Effect of Vertical Shoot-Positioned, Smart-Dyson, and Geneva Double-Curtain Training Systems on Viognier Grape and Wine Composition
【24h】

Effect of Vertical Shoot-Positioned, Smart-Dyson, and Geneva Double-Curtain Training Systems on Viognier Grape and Wine Composition

机译:竖拍定位,Smart Dyson和Geneva双幕训练系统对维欧尼葡萄和葡萄酒成分的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Viognier grapes grown in northern Virginia and resultant wines were evaluated as a function of training system. Treatments included vertical shoot-positioned (VSP), Smart-Dyson (SD), and Geneva double curtain (GDC), with vines of all treatments spaced 2.4 m apart in 3.0 m wide rows. In addition to increased cluster numbers and crop yield, GDC training generally increased fruit zone sunlight interception and fruit exposure, while it decreased cane pruning weights per meter of cordon, compared with SD and VSP. Crop adjustments were made between bloom and veraison in six seasons, to result in average yields of 10.5 kg/vine (GDC), 9.9 kg/vine (SD), and 6.0 kg/vine (VSP), with the lower SD canopy bearing 30 to 40% less crop than the corresponding upper SD canopy. Crop loads (yield/cane pruning weight) were generally between 4 and 12; GDC crop load approached 20 in three seasons, while SD approached 14 in one. Leaf area per crop ratio was determined one season and exceeded 1.8 m~2/kg of fruit for all systems. Fruit was harvested at similar Brix values, with differences in berry weight, pH, titratable acidity, and malic and tartaric acids among treatments generally not significant. Volatile compounds were analyzed using headspace solid-phase microextraction GC-MS. Fruit showed consistent differences in linalool, α-terpineol, β-damascenone, and n-hexanol concentrations among training systems. SD had the highest concentration of most free volatiles quantified in both juice and wines, while GDC wines frequently had the highest concentration of phenol-free glycosides. Triangle difference sensory testing demonstrated differences between GDC and SD in wine aroma and flavor and between VSP and SD in flavor. GDC wines generally had higher fruity and floral aromas compared with the other systems.
机译:弗吉尼亚州北部种植的维奥尼(Viognier)葡萄和所得葡萄酒根据培训系统进行了评估。处理方法包括竖拍定位(VSP),Smart-Dyson(SD)和Geneva双帘(GDC),所有处理的葡萄藤在3.0 m宽的行中间隔2.4 m。除了增加簇数和增加作物产量外,与SD和VSP相比,GDC训练通常增加了水果区的日光截留量和水果暴露量,同时减少了每米警戒线的甘蔗修剪重量。在六个季节的开花和季节之间调整作物,以使平均单产分别为10.5千克/株(GDC),9.9千克/株(SD)和6.0千克/株(VSP),而下部SD冠层的产量为30比相应的上部SD冠层少40%。作物负荷(产量/甘蔗修剪重量)通常在4到12之间。在三个季节中,GDC的农作物负载接近20,而SD的农作物负载接近14。在一个季节确定每作物比例的叶面积,并且所有系统的果实均超过1.8 m〜2 / kg的果实。果实以相似的白利糖度值收获,浆果重量,pH,可滴定酸度以及苹果酸和酒石酸之间的差异通常在处理中并不明显。使用顶空固相微萃取GC-MS分析挥发性化合物。水果在训练系统之间的芳樟醇,α-松油醇,β-大马烯酮和正己醇浓度方面显示出一致的差异。在果汁和葡萄酒中,SD的大多数游离挥发物含量最高,而GDC葡萄酒中的无酚糖苷含量最高。三角差异感官测试表明,葡萄酒香气和风味中的GDC和SD之间以及风味中的VSP和SD之间存在差异。与其他系统相比,GDC葡萄酒通常具有更高的果香和花香。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号