首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >Comments on John B. Shoven and John Whalley, 'Irving Fisher's Spendings (Consumption) Tax in Retrospect'
【24h】

Comments on John B. Shoven and John Whalley, 'Irving Fisher's Spendings (Consumption) Tax in Retrospect'

机译:评论John B. Shoven和John Whalley,“怀旧地费舍尔的支出(消费)税”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

John Shoven and John Whalley are certainly correct in their two basic observations concerning Irving Fisher's contribution to the tax policy debate nearly six decades ago. First, Fisher was far ahead of his time substantively. His detailed treatment in his 1942 book Constructive Income Taxation of what we now call a personalized progressive consumption tax could have served as the blueprint for the "USA" ("unlimited savings allowance") tax (a progressive consumption tax) introduced in 1995 by Senators Sam Nunn (D-GA) and Pete Domenici (R-NM). Indeed, that tax would have avoided much complexity and many pitfalls had it simply followed Irving Fisher's recommendations of how to treat borrowing (Ginsburg 1995; Warren 1995). Second, Shoven and Whalley properly remind us that Irving Fisher's contribution in detailing how to implement a progressive tax on consumption has largely been lost. The intellectual history of this subject usually goes back only as far as Nicholas Kaldor's 1955 book The Expenditure Tax, even though, as Shoven and Whalley point out, Kaldor himself made extensive references to Fisher's work. In fact, neither William Andrews's influential work nor my own detailed article on implementing a progressive consumption tax refer to Fisher's contribution (Andrews 1974; Graetz 1979), although we all agree about the proper resolution of many of the issues Fisher discussed.
机译:约翰·肖文(John Shoven)和约翰·沃利(John Whalley)在关于欧文·费舍尔(Irving Fisher)近六十年前对税收政策辩论的贡献的两个基本观点中肯定是正确的。首先,费舍尔大大领先于他的时代。他在1942年出版的《建设性所得税》(我们现在称为个性化的累进消费税)中的详细论述本可以作为参议员于1995年引入的“美国”(“无限储蓄津贴”)税(累进消费税)的蓝图。 Sam Nunn(D-GA)和Pete Domenici(R-NM)。的确,如果仅遵循欧文·费舍尔(Irving Fisher)关于如何处理借款的建议(Ginsburg,1995; Warren,1995),该税本来可以避免很多复杂性和许多陷阱。其次,Shoven和Whalley恰当地提醒我们,欧文·费舍尔(Erving Fisher)在详细说明如何对消费实施累进税方面的贡献已大为丧失。该学科的知识历史通常可以追溯到尼古拉斯·卡尔多(Nicholas Kaldor)1955年的著作《支出税》,尽管正如Shoven和Whalley所指出的那样,卡尔多本人也广泛引用了费舍尔的著作。实际上,虽然我们都同意费舍尔所讨论的许多问题的妥善解决,但威廉·安德鲁斯的影响力著作和我自己的关于实施累进消费税的详细文章都没有提到费舍尔的贡献(Andrews 1974; Graetz 1979)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号