首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Criminal Justice >The Debate over Police Reform: Examining Minority Support for Citizen Oversight and Resistance by Police Unions
【24h】

The Debate over Police Reform: Examining Minority Support for Citizen Oversight and Resistance by Police Unions

机译:警察改革之争:审查少数民族对警察工会对公民监督和抵抗的支持

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Researchers have argued that the creation of citizen oversight often involves debate between those that support its use and the police which do not. Police unions, for example, have a long history of objecting to the creation of oversight, especially during collective bargaining. Minority demands for police reform, on the other hand, can lend support for its implementation, especially after a highly publicized case of misconduct between the police and minority citizens. Using a retrospective approach, this study examined the extent to which these opposing forces influenced the existence of oversight. Findings suggest that departments that engage in collective bargaining were no more likely to use an oversight agency than departments that did not engage in collective bargaining. Cities with large percentages of African Americans, however, were more likely to have an existing oversight agency.
机译:研究人员认为,建立公民监督常常需要在支持公民监督的警察与不支持公民监督的警察之间进行辩论。例如,警察工会反对建立监督的历史由来已久,特别是在集体谈判期间。另一方面,少数群体对警察改革的要求可以为实施该改革提供支持,尤其是在警察与少数族裔公民之间的不当行为广为流传的情况下。本研究采用回顾性方法,研究了这些对立力量对监督存在的影响程度。调查结果表明,参与集体谈判的部门比没有参与集体谈判的部门更不可能使用监督机构。但是,非裔美国人比例较高的城市更可能拥有现有的监督机构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号