首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Agricultural Economics >Standards as Barriers Versus Standards as Catalysts: Assessing the Impact of HACCP Implementation on U.S. Seafood Imports
【24h】

Standards as Barriers Versus Standards as Catalysts: Assessing the Impact of HACCP Implementation on U.S. Seafood Imports

机译:作为障碍的标准与作为催化剂的标准:评估HACCP实施对美国海产品进口的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The United States mandated a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) food safety standard for seafood in 1997. Panel model results for 1990 to 2004 suggest that HACCP introduction had a negative and significant impact on overall imports from the top thirty-three suppliers. While the effect for developed countries was positive, the negative effect for developing countries supports the view of “standards as barriers” versus “standards as catalysts.” A different perspective emerges from individual country-level analysis. Regardless of development status, leading seafood exporters generally experienced a positive HACCP effect, while most other smaller trading partners faced a negative effect.
机译:美国于1997年对海鲜实施了危害分析关键控制点(HACCP)食品安全标准。1990年至2004年的面板模型结果表明,引入HACCP对前33家供应商的总体进口具有负面影响。虽然对发达国家的影响是积极的,但对发展中国家的负面影响则支持“标准是障碍”与“标准是催化剂”的观点。从各个国家层面的分析得出了不同的观点。无论发展状况如何,主要的海产品出口商总体上都具有积极的HACCP效应,而其他大多数较小的贸易伙伴都面临着负面效应。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Journal of Agricultural Economics》 |2009年第2期|p.310-321|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Sven M. Anders is assistant professor, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta and Julie A. Caswell is professor, Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号