首页> 外文期刊>Water Science and Technology >Emission standards versus immission standards for assessing the impact of urban drainage on ephemeral receiving water bodies
【24h】

Emission standards versus immission standards for assessing the impact of urban drainage on ephemeral receiving water bodies

机译:排放标准与排放标准的比较,以评估城市排水对临时接收水体的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the past, emission standard indicators have been adopted by environmental regulation authorities in order to preserve the quality of a receiving water body. Such indicators are based on the frequency or magnitude of a polluted discharge that may be continuous or intermittent. In order to properly maintain the quality of receiving waters, the Water Framework Directive, following the basic ideas of British Urban Pollution Manual, has been established. The Directive has overtaken the emission-standard concept, substituting it with the stream-standard concept that fixes discharge limits for each polluting substance depending on the self-depurative characteristics of receiving waters. Stream-standard assessment requires the deployment of measurement campaigns that can be very expensive; furthermore, the measurement campaigns are usually not able to provide a link between the receiving water quality and the polluting sources. Therefore, it would be very useful to find a correlation between the quality status of the natural waters and the emission-based indicators. Thus, this study is aimed to finding a possible connection between the receiving water quality indicators drawn by environmental regulation authorities and emission-based indicators while considering both continuous (i.e. from the wastewater treatment plants) and intermittent pollution discharges (mainly from combined sewer overflows). Such research has been carried out by means of long-term analysis adopting a holistic modelling approach. The different parts of the integrated urban drainage system were modelled by a parsimonious integrated model. The analysis was applied to an ephemeral river bounding Bologna (Italy). The study concluded that the correlation between receiving water quality and polluting emissions cannot be generally stated. Nevertheless, specific analyses on polluting emissions were pointed out in the study highlighting cause-effect link between polluting sources and receiving water quality.
机译:过去,环境管理机构采用了排放标准指标,以保持接收水体的质量。此类指标基于连续或间歇的污染排放物的频率或大小。为了适当地维持接收水的质量,遵循英国城市污染手册的基本思想,建立了水框架指令。该指令已经取代了排放标准概念,而用流标准概念代替了该标准,该标准根据接收水的自净化特性确定每种污染物质的排放限值。流标准评估要求部署评估活动,这可能非常昂贵;此外,测量活动通常不能在接收水质和污染源之间建立联系。因此,找到天然水质状况与排放指标之间的相关性将非常有用。因此,本研究旨在寻找环境监管机构制定的接收水质指标与基于排放的指标之间的可能联系,同时考虑连续(即来自废水处理厂)和间歇性污染物排放(主要是来自下水道溢流的排放) 。这种研究是通过采用整体建模方法的长期分析进行的。综合城市排水系统的不同部分采用简约的综合模型建模。该分析应用于以博洛尼亚(意大利)为界的短暂河流。研究得出的结论是,接收水质量与污染排放之间的相关性不能得到一般性的陈述。然而,研究指出了对污染排放的具体分析,强调了污染源与接收水质之间的因果关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号