首页> 外文期刊>The American Economist >DO ECONOMISTS PLAY WELL WITH OTHERS? EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMICS EDUCATION AND PRO-SOCIAL BEHAVIOR
【24h】

DO ECONOMISTS PLAY WELL WITH OTHERS? EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMICS EDUCATION AND PRO-SOCIAL BEHAVIOR

机译:经济学家与其他人玩得很好吗?关于经济学教育与亲社会行为之间关系的实验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Does an economics education affect an individual's behavior? It is unclear whether differences in behavior are due to the education or whether those who choose to study economics are different. This issue is addressed using experimental evidence from the Trust Game where trusting and reciprocating behaviors can be measured. First, it is shown that economics students provide greater trusting investments and reciprocate more. Accounting for the selection effect, these effects are explained by those who choose to study economics and not directly from the education being provided. Thus, economists play well with others and these social preferences are not taught in the classroom.
机译:经济学教育会影响个人的行为吗?尚不清楚行为的差异是由于受教育所致还是选择学习经济学的人是否有所不同。可使用信任博弈中的实验证据解决此问题,在信任博弈中可以测量信任和往复行为。首先,它表明经济学专业的学生提供了更多的信任投资,并且回报更多。考虑到选择效应,这些效应是由那些选择学习经济学而不是直接从所提供的教育中来的人们解释的。因此,经济学家与他人打得很好,课堂上也没有教授这些社会偏好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号