首页> 外文期刊>The American Economist >Editors' Note: Farewells, Welcomes, Thanks, Awards, and a Special Issue
【24h】

Editors' Note: Farewells, Welcomes, Thanks, Awards, and a Special Issue

机译:编辑注意:告别,欢迎,谢谢,奖项和特殊问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Eleven years ago, Michael Szenberg, Editor-in-Chief of The American Economist (AEX), invited me to succeed him upon his pending retirement. This was an exciting, but at the same time, an intimidating offer. How could anyone follow Michael? Michael had edited the AEX for 38 years-surely a modern-day longevity record for an economics journal editor. Over almost four decades, Michael edited and published hundreds of articles, notes, book reviews, and comments from virtually every specialization and subfield in the discipline. He raised the profile of the journal by publishing numerous papers authored by Nobel laureates and leading minds in economics while at the same time nurturing young scholars who were learning the craft of publishing their research.2 It would be difficult for anyone to follow in Michael's footsteps. When I asked him why he chose to ask me, his surprising response was "the patience and kindness" I had shown to others while serving as an associate editor for the journal. Michael explained that he valued the importance of frank and honest reviews that did not discourage authors but rather encouraged them to improve their work and to correct their mistakes. For Michael, a good rejection letter was "invigorating" as it offered an opportunity to learn how to improve upon one's work.3 As editors write many more rejection letters than acceptance letters, this was the editorial philosophy that Michael wanted to pass on, and I have tried my best to follow it over the years that have followed.
机译:十一年前,美国经济学家(AEX)的主编迈克尔·萨伯格(AEX),邀请我在待退休后取得成功。这是一个令人兴奋的,但同时是一种恐吓的报价。谁怎么跟随迈克尔? Michael已经编辑了38年的AEX - 肯定是经济学期刊编辑的现代长寿记录。几乎四十年,迈克尔编辑并出版了数百篇文章,笔记,书评,几乎所有专业和纪律的子场。他通过发布诺贝尔·洛瑞斯和经济学领导思想的众多论文提出了杂志的档案,同时培养了学习出版研究的工艺的年轻学者.2任何人都会追随迈克尔的脚步。当我问他为什么选择问我时,他令人惊讶的反应是我向他人展示的“耐心和善良”,同时担任期刊的助理编辑。迈克尔解释说,他重视坦率和诚实评论的重要性,这些评价并没有劝阻作者,而是鼓励他们改善他们的工作并纠正他们的错误。对于迈克尔来说,一个良好的拒绝信是“振奋”,因为它提供了学习如何改善一个人的工作的机会。如编辑写得多的拒绝信,而迈克尔想要通过,而且多年来,我尽力追随它。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The American Economist》 |2021年第1期|3-6|共4页
  • 作者单位

    Pittsburg State University KS USA;

    University of Delaware Newark USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 23:25:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号