首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >Estimating regulation-induced substitution: the effect of the clean air act on water and ground pollution
【24h】

Estimating regulation-induced substitution: the effect of the clean air act on water and ground pollution

机译:估算法规引起的替代:清洁空气对水和地面污染的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent research has demonstrated that the regulations imposed by the Clean Air Act Amendments' (CAAA's) are associated with reductions in manufacturing activity and improvements in ambient air quality (J. Vernon Henderson, 1996; Randy Becker and Henderson, 2000, 2001; Greenstone, 2002, 2003; Kenneth Chay and Greenstone, 2003a, b). Some portion of these reductions in emissions is due to lower output and changes in inputs. It is widely believed, however, that much of the reduction is due to air-pollution-abatement devices such as scrubbers and electrostatic precipitators. These abatement devices remove the pollutants from the air, but they are generally not eliminated, and the residuals are released into water bodies, landfills, or injected into the ground. The possibility that the CAAA's have the unintended consequence of increasing releases into other media has not been examined in the economics literature previously. If this cross-media substitution is important, then a complete accounting of the costs and benefits of this legislation requires measures of its extent and the damages associated with releases into each of these media.
机译:最近的研究表明,《清洁空气法修正案》(CAAA's)实施的法规与减少制造业活动和改善环境空气质量有关(J. Vernon Henderson,1996; Randy Becker and Henderson,2000,2001; Greenstone, 2002,2003; Kenneth Chay和Greenstone,2003a,b)。这些排放量减少的部分原因是产量降低和投入的变化。但是,人们普遍认为,减少的大部分原因是减少空气污染的装置,例如洗涤器和静电除尘器。这些减排设备可以从空气中清除污染物,但通常无法消除,残留物会释放到水体,垃圾填埋场或注入地下。以前在经济学文献中没有研究过CAAA可能会增加向其他媒体的释放,从而产生意想不到的后果。如果这种跨媒体替代很重要,那么要全面衡量该法规的成本和收益,就需要衡量其范围以及与释放到每种媒体中相关的损害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号