首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >Some evidence on race, welfare reform, and household income
【24h】

Some evidence on race, welfare reform, and household income

机译:有关种族,福利改革和家庭收入的一些证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In 1996, federal welfare-reform legislation eliminated Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and replaced it with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). Numerous studies have estimated impacts of reform on welfare caseloads, employment, earnings, family structure, income, and poverty. Two principal challenges to identifying TANF's impact have been discussed in the literature. First, factors other than welfare reform should have increased household income. It is well known that reform occurred during a period of strong economic performance. While the unemployment rate for blacks fell to the lowest level ever recorded, wages for low-skill groups rose for the first time since the 1970's. Further, other policy changes in the second half of the 1990's focused on improving the economic status of the disadvantaged. Examples include expansions in the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), minimum wages, and public health insurance (Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program). Second, TANF was implemented in all states over just 16 months (between September 1996 and January 1998), leaving only limited scope for identifying impacts of TANF through timing across states.
机译:1996年,联邦福利改革法案取消了对有待抚养子女的家庭援助(AFDC),取而代之的是对有需要的家庭的临时援助(TANF)。许多研究估计了改革对福利案件量,就业,收入,家庭结构,收入和贫困的影响。在文献中已经讨论了识别TANF的影响的两个主要挑战。首先,除福利改革外的其他因素应增加家庭收入。众所周知,改革发生在强劲的经济表现时期。尽管黑人的失业率降至有记录以来的最低水平,但低技能群体的工资自1970年代以来首次上升。此外,1990年代下半年的其他政策变化着眼于改善弱势群体的经济状况。例如,扩大收入所得税抵免(EITC),最低工资和公共健康保险(Medicaid和儿童健康保险计划)。其次,TANF仅在16个月内(从1996年9月到1998年1月)就在所有州中实施,通过州间时间确定TANF的影响的范围非常有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号