首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >History, Institutions, and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India
【24h】

History, Institutions, and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India

机译:历史,制度和经济绩效:印度殖民地土地保有权制度的遗产

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We analyze the colonial land revenue institutions set up by the British in India, and show that differences in historical property rights institutions lead to sustained differences in economic outcomes. Areas in which proprietary rights in land were historically given to landlords have significantly lower agricultural investments and productivity in the post-independence period than areas in which these rights were given to the cultivators. These areas also have significantly lower investments in health and education. These differences are not driven by omitted variables or endogeneity problems; they probably arise because differences in historical institutions lead to very different policy choices.
机译:我们分析了英国人在印度建立的殖民地土地收入制度,并表明历史产权制度的差异导致经济成果的持续差异。从历史上讲,土地所有权被授予地主的地区在独立后时期的农业投资和生产力明显低于授予耕种者的土地。这些领域在卫生和教育方面的投资也大大减少。这些差异并非由遗漏的变量或内生性问题驱动;之所以会出现这种情况,是因为历史制度的差异导致了非常不同的政策选择。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The American economic review》 |2005年第4期|p.1190-1213|共24页
  • 作者

    ABHIJIT BANERJEE; LAKSHMI IYER;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 50 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02139;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宏观经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:28:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号