首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >Incomplete Contracts and Ownership: Some New Thoughts
【24h】

Incomplete Contracts and Ownership: Some New Thoughts

机译:不完整的合同和所有权:一些新思想

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Since Ronald H. Coase's famous 1937 article, economists have grappled with the question of what characterizes a firm and what determines its boundaries. Transaction cost economics (see, e.g., Oliver Williamson 1975, 1985; Benjamin Klein, Robert G. Crawford, and Armen A. Alchian 1978) argues that firms are important when contracts are incomplete, and parties make large relationship-specific investments. Property rights theory (see, e.g., Sanford J. Grossman and Oliver D. Hart 1986; Hart and John Moore 1990) refines this thinking by taking the view that the owner of a nonhuman asset possesses residual control rights over that asset, and that there is an optimal allocation of such residual control rights. As a consequence, not all activities should take place in a single firm.
机译:自从罗纳德·H·科斯(Ronald H. Coase)于1937年发表著名文章以来,经济学家一直在努力研究企业的特征和边界的问题。交易成本经济学(例如,参见Oliver Williamson 1975,1985; Benjamin Klein,Robert G.Crawford和Armen A.Alchian 1978)认为,当合同不完整且当事方进行大量针对特定关系的投资时,公司很重要。财产权理论(例如,见Sanford J. Grossman和Oliver D. Hart 1986; Hart和John Moore 1990)通过考虑非人类资产的所有者对该资产拥有剩余控制权的观点来完善这一思想。是此类剩余控制权的最佳分配。因此,并非所有活动都应在单个公司中进行。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The American economic review》 |2007年第2期|p.182-186|共5页
  • 作者

    Oliver Hart; John Moore;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics, Harvard University, Littauer Center 220, Cambridge, MA 02138;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宏观经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:27:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号