首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >Changes in Safety Net Use During the Great Recession
【24h】

Changes in Safety Net Use During the Great Recession

机译:经济大萧条期间安全网使用的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Great Recession (GR) is widely characterized as the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. As might be expected in a period of such dire economic circumstances, participation in safety net programs increased. Here, we are interested in understanding not only this increase, but also in how these programs affect households at different parts of the income distribution. We examine at which points in the income-to-poverty distribution different programs find purchase, both in terms of participation and in terms of the fraction of a households' resources that these transfers comprise. In addition, we calculate how much of the change during the GR is due to falling income-to-poverty levels and other changes in household characteristics that directly affect program eligibility, and how much is due to changes in participation conditional on these factors. We find that program participation and benefits vary greatly across the income distribution by program, and that these differences carry over to the changes we see during the GR. For example, participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly food stamps) is especially high for households below the poverty line, with increases over the GR distributed mainly to not just those households, but also those above the poverty threshold. For the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), participation is highest for households that are right around the poverty line, with the largest increases seen for those with incomes between about 80 and 160 percent of the threshold. By contrast, while public assistance (cash welfare) has the highest participation rate below the poverty line, during the GR there was no increase in participation or share of income from the program.
机译:大萧条(GR)被广泛认为是自大萧条以来最严重的经济衰退。正如在经济形势严峻时期所预期的那样,对安全网计划的参与有所增加。在这里,我们不仅有兴趣了解这种增长,而且有兴趣了解这些计划如何影响收入分配不同部分的家庭。我们从参与度以及这些转移所占家庭资源的比例的角度,研究了不同计划在收入向贫困分配的哪一点找到了购买。此外,我们计算遗传资源变化期间有多少变化是由于收入与贫困水平下降以及其他直接影响计划资格的家庭特征变化,以及有多少是由于这些因素而导致的参与度变化。我们发现,在计划收入分配中,计划的参与度和收益差异很大,并且这些差异会延续到GR期间看到的变化。例如,对于贫困线以下的家庭来说,参加补充营养援助计划(SNAP,以前是食品券)的比例特别高,遗传资源的增加不仅主要分配给那些家庭,而且也分配给贫困线以上的家庭。对于收入所得税抵免(EITC),处于贫困线附近的家庭的参与度最高,对于收入介于阈值的80%至160%之间的家庭,参与度最高。相比之下,虽然公共援助(现金福利)的参与率低于贫困线,但参与率最高,但在GR期间,该计划的参与或收入份额并未增加。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The American economic review》 |2015年第5期|161-165|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics, Dartmouth College, 6106 Rockefeller Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, and NBER;

    Department of Economics, Wellesley College, Pendleton East, 106 Central Street, Wellesley, MA 02481, and NBER;

    Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, and NBER;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:26:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号