...
【24h】

Private FCPA Enforcement

机译:私人FCPA执法

获取原文

摘要

Federal courts have uniformly held that there is no implied private right of action under the FCPA. Most such decisions have relied on a 1990 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit that is seriously flawed. Careful examination of the Sixth Circuit's analysis reveals that, contrary to the court's conclusion, a strong argument can be made that a private right of action should be implied. But even if the Sixth Circuit is correct, an even stronger argument can be made that Congress should amend the FCPA to create an express private right of action. Such an amendment would produce a number of significant benefits. These benefits include compensation of the victims of foreign bribery, enhanced deterrence of foreign bribery, alignment of U.S. foreign antibribery policy with international conventions, and long-denied judicial review of the FCPA's key provisions. A private right of action under the FCPA should be recognized for all of these reasons.
机译:联邦法院一致认为,《反海外腐败法》没有隐含的私人诉讼权。大多数这样的决定都是基于美国第六巡回上诉法院1990年的一项判决,该判决存在严重缺陷。仔细检查第六巡回法院的分析后发现,与法院的结论相反,可以有力地主张应隐含一项私人诉讼权。但是,即使第六巡回法院是正确的,也可以提出更强有力的论据,要求国会修改FCPA以建立明确的私人诉讼权。这样的修正将产生许多重大利益。这些好处包括赔偿外国贿赂的受害人,增强外国贿赂的威慑力,使美国的外国反贿赂政策与国际公约保持一致以及对FCPA关键条款的长期司法审查。由于所有这些原因,应承认《反海外腐败法》规定的私人诉权。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American business law journal 》 |2012年第3期| p.419-506| 共88页
  • 作者

    Gideon Mark;

  • 作者单位

    Business Law, University of Maryland School of Business.Brandeis University, Columbia University, Harvard University, New York University, and the University of California.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号