首页> 外文期刊>Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation >SUPREME COURT BACKS 'LOOK THROUGH' JURISDICTION, THEN REVERSES AN ARBITRATION ORDER
【24h】

SUPREME COURT BACKS 'LOOK THROUGH' JURISDICTION, THEN REVERSES AN ARBITRATION ORDER

机译:最高法院支持“直视”管辖权,然后撤消仲裁令

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The first decision in the group of three arbitration cases argued in the 2008-2009 U.S. Supreme Court term arrived last month, with the Court reversing a Fourth U.S. Circuit Court arbitration order. The decision sent a credit card provider back to a state trial court to prove its case.rnBut Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's opinion in Vaden v. Discover Bank et al., No. 07-773 (March 9, 2009), doesn't necessarily mean that Discover Bank will have to fight its case in the Maryland court where it filed a debt collection action against original defendant Betty Vaden.
机译:在2008年至2009年美国最高法院一案中辩论的三起仲裁案中的第一项裁决于上个月到达,法院撤销了美国第四巡回法院的一项仲裁命令。该决定将信用卡提供商送回州初审法院以证明其案情。这必然意味着,发现银行将不得不在马里兰州法院对它的案子进行抗辩,该法院对原告被告贝蒂·瓦登(Betty Vaden)提起诉讼。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号