首页> 外文期刊>Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation >HOW MUCH LITIGATION WAIVES RIGHT TO ARBITRATION?
【24h】

HOW MUCH LITIGATION WAIVES RIGHT TO ARBITRATION?

机译:多少诉讼放弃了仲裁权?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

According to the Third Circuit, two months may be enough, at least on the very specific facts in Supermedia v. Affordable Electric, Inc., 2014 WL 1690749 (3d Cir. April 30, 2014; 1.usa.gov/1oX5w4n). Supermedia sued Affordable Electric (AE) in district court, alleging breach of a contract for advertising services. Over a period of nearly one year, AE moved unsuccessfully for dismissal, answered the complaint, and participated in discovery, all without raising the existence of an arbitration agreement as an affirmative defense. One defense AE did raise was that Martin Morley, who had signed the contract on behalf of AE, did not have authority to bind the company. Several months after its first suit, AE also sued Morley directly for breach of warranty based on representations he made in forming the advertising contract, and the district court consolidated the cases.
机译:根据第三巡回法院的裁决,至少就Supermedia诉Affordable Electric,Inc.,2014年WL 1690749(3d Cir。2014年4月30日; 1.usa.gov/1oX5w4n)中非常具体的事实而言,两个月就足够了。 Supermedia在地方法院起诉Affordable Electric(AE),指控其违反了广告服务合同。在将近一年的时间里,AE未能成功解雇,回答投诉并参与了发现,但都没有提出仲裁协议作为肯定的抗辩理由。 AE提出的一个辩护是,代表AE签署合同的Martin Morley无权约束该公司。在第一起诉讼之后的几个月,AE还根据他在撰写广告合同中所做的陈述直接起诉Morley违反保修条款,地区法院对此案进行了合并。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号