...
首页> 外文期刊>Alcohol and Alcoholism >DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE AMSTERDAM MOTIVES FOR DRINKING SCALE (AMDS): AN ATTEMPT TO DISTINGUISH RELIEF AND REWARD DRINKERS
【24h】

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE AMSTERDAM MOTIVES FOR DRINKING SCALE (AMDS): AN ATTEMPT TO DISTINGUISH RELIEF AND REWARD DRINKERS

机译:阿姆斯特丹规模饮料动机(AMDS)的开发和验证:区分救济和奖励饮料的尝试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Determination of alcoholic subtypes is a promising strategy for patient treatment matching with anti-craving interventions. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a questionnaire on drinking motives that can distinguish relief and reward drinkers. Methods: A 103-item self-report questionnaire was developed: the Amsterdam Motives for Drinking Scale (AMDS). The AMDS was tested in two samples of alcoholics (Sample A: n = 251; Sample B: n = 197). The psychometric properties were examined in Sample A and cross-validated in B. Results: The AMDS consists of a relief scale and a reward scale, both containing distinct subscales. All (sub)scales had good internal consistency. However, the relief and reward scales were highly correlated (Sample A: r = 0.84, P < 0.01; Sample B: r = 0.76, P < 0.01), and convergent and divergent validity was only partly confirmed. The lowest correlations were found between the relief subscale ‘stress and vulnerability’ and the reward subscale ‘stimulation seeking’ (Sample A: r = 0.33, P < 0.01; Sample B: r = 0.13, P > 0.01). Conclusions: The AMDS reliably measures two types of motives. However, the relief and reward scales are highly correlated. Lower correlations were found only at the subscale level. It is concluded that most treatment-seeking alcoholics have both relief and reward motives. More research is needed on the relationship between motives for drinking and other phenotypic, endophenotypic and genetic indicators of relief and reward drinking, and appropriate cut-off points. Only than we can draw firm conclusions regarding the potential of drinking motives for patient treatment matching.
机译:酒精亚型的确定是一种有前途的策略,可以配合抗渴望的干预措施进行患者治疗。这项研究的目的是开发和验证关于饮酒动机的问卷,以区分饮酒者和奖励饮酒者。方法:制定了一项103项自我报告调查表:阿姆斯特丹饮酒量表(AMDS)。在两个酗酒者样本中测试了AMDS(样本A:n = 251;样本B:n = 197)。在样本A中检查了心理计量学性质,在样本B中进行了交叉验证。结果:AMDS包括缓解量表和奖励量表,两者均包含不同的子量表。所有(次级)量表均具有良好的内部一致性。但是,救济和报酬量表高度相关(样本A:r = 0.84,P <0.01;样本B:r = 0.76,P <0.01),并且收敛性和发散性的有效性仅得到部分确认。救济子量表“压力和脆弱性”与奖励子量表“寻求刺激”之间的相关性最低(样本A:r = 0.33,P <0.01;样本B:r = 0.13,P> 0.01)。结论:AMDS可靠地衡量了两种动机。但是,救济和奖励的等级高度相关。仅在子量表水平发现较低的相关性。结论是,大多数寻求治疗的酗酒者都有缓解和奖励的动机。需要进一步研究饮酒动机与其他表型,内在表型和缓解和奖励饮酒的遗传指标以及适当的分界点之间的关系。只有这样,我们才能得出有关饮酒动机与患者治疗匹配潜力的坚定结论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Alcohol and Alcoholism》 |2006年第3期|284-292|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research Amsterdam The Netherlands;

    Department of Psychiatry Academic Medical Center and;

    Department of Clinical Psychology University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands and;

    Viersprong Institute for Studies on Personality Disorders (VISPD) Halsteren The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号