首页> 外文期刊>Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology >PSO and GA tuned conventional and fractional order PID controllers for quadrotor control
【24h】

PSO and GA tuned conventional and fractional order PID controllers for quadrotor control

机译:PSO和GA调谐传统和分数级PID控制器,用于四射频控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose This study aims to compare the performance of the conventional and fractional order proportional-integral-derivative (PID and FOPID) controllers tuned with a particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) for quadrotor control. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the gains of the controllers were tuned using PSO and GA, which are included in the heuristic optimization methods. The tuning processes of the controller's gains were formulated as optimization problems. While generating the objective functions (cost functions), four different decision criteria were considered separately: integrated summation error (ISE), integrated absolute error, integrated time absolute error and integrated time summation error (ITSE). Findings According to the simulation results and comparison tables that were created, FOPID controllers tuned with PSO performed better performances than PID controllers. In addition, the ITSE criterion returned better results in control of all axes except for altitude control when compared to the other cost functions. In the control of altitude with the PID controller, the ISE criterion showed better performance. Originality/value While a conventional PID controller has three parameters (Kp, Ki, Kd) that need to be tuned, FOPID controllers have two additional parameters (mu). The inclusion of these two extra parameters means more flexibility in the controller design but much more complexity for parameter tuning. This study reveals the potential and effectiveness of PSO and GA in tuning the controller despite the increased number of parameters and complexity.
机译:目的本研究旨在比较用粒子群优化(PSO)和遗传算法(GA)进行调整的传统和分数比例 - 积分 - 积分(PID和FOPID)控制器的性能,用于四态控制。设计/方法/方法在本研究中,使用PSO和GA调整控制器的增益,该PSO和GA包括在启发式优化方法中。控制器收益的调谐过程被制定为优化问题。在生成目标函数(成本函数)的同时,分别考虑四个不同的决策标准:集成求和错误(ISE),集成的绝对误差,集成时间绝对误差和集成时间求和错误(ITSE)。调查结果根据模拟结果和创建的比较表,使用PSO调整的FoPID控制器比PID控制器更好地执行。此外,除了与其他成本函数相比,ITSE标准还返回了除了高度控制之外的所有轴的控制。在使用PID控制器的高度控制中,ISE标准显示出更好的性能。最初的PID控制器具有需要调谐的三个参数(KP,KI,KD),而FoPID控制器具有两个附加参数(MU)。包含这两个额外的参数意味着控制器设计中的灵活性更多,但参数调谐更复杂。本研究尽管参数和复杂性增加,但揭示了PSO和GA在调整控制器时的潜力和有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号