...
【24h】

Letters

机译:字母

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I enjoyed Adam Hebert's "Issue Brief" on AFSO 21 in the January 2008 edition of Air Force Magazine [p. 20]. When addressing the difficulty in clearly explaining AFSO 21, his following comment particularly caught my attention: "Part of the problem is that AFSO 21 and its descriptions are laden with jargon and buzzwords. Lean. Six Sigma. Theory of constraints. Business process re-engineering. Just-in-time inventory. Blah, blah, blah." The tools mentioned above precede AFSO 21.They were important elements of the Total Quality Management (TQM) movement that was popular back in the 1980s and 1990s. We had great senior leader support in the early stages of TQM, but much of the support waned as time passed. A lot of what was going on then is what I think I see going on now in the Air Force. The real challenge is yet to be faced: What are AFSO 21 and the Air Force going to look like in years to come?
机译:我在2008年1月的《空军杂志》上欣赏了亚当·赫伯特关于AFSO 21的“问题简介”。 20]。在解决难以清楚解释AFSO 21的困难时,他的以下评论特别引起了我的注意:“部分问题是AFSO 21及其说明中充斥着行话和流行语。精益。六个西格玛。约束理论。业务流程重新工程。及时库存。等等,等等。”上面提到的工具先于AFSO 21,它们是全面质量管理(TQM)运动的重要元素,该运动在1980年代和1990年代很流行。在TQM的早期阶段,我们得到了高层领导的大力支持,但是随着时间的流逝,很多支持都在减少。当时发生的很多事情是我认为我现在在空军中看到的。真正的挑战尚待解决:AFSO 21和空军在未来几年会是什么样?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号