...
首页> 外文期刊>AI & SOCIETY >Naturalizing language: human appraisal and (quasi) technology
【24h】

Naturalizing language: human appraisal and (quasi) technology

机译:语言归化:人工评估和(准)技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using contemporary science, the paper builds on Wittgenstein’s views of human language. Rather than ascribing reality to inscription-like entities, it links embodiment with distributed cognition. The verbal or (quasi) technological aspect of language is traced to not action, but human specific interactivity. This species-specific form of sense-making sustains, among other things, using texts, making/construing phonetic gestures and thinking. Human action is thus grounded in appraisals or sense-saturated coordination. To illustrate interactivity at work, the paper focuses on a case study. Over 11 s, a crime scene investigator infers that she is probably dealing with an inside job: she uses not words, but intelligent gaze. This connects professional expertise to circumstances and the feeling of thinking. It is suggested that, as for other species, human appraisal is based in synergies. However, since the verbal aspect of language constrains action and thinking, we also develop customary ways of behaving. Humans extend embodiment by linking real-time activity to actions through which the collectivity imposes a variable degree of control over how individuals realise values.
机译:该论文利用当代科学,以维特根斯坦对人类语言的观点为基础。与其将现实归属于类似铭文的实体,不如将实施与分布式认知联系起来。语言的言语或(半)技术方面不是行为,而是人类特定的交互性。这种特定于物种的形式的感觉维持,除其他外,还使用文本,进行/解释语音手势和思考。因此,人类的行动基于评估或饱和的协调。为了说明工作中的交互性,本文着重于案例研究。 11岁以上,犯罪现场调查人员推断她可能正在从事内部工作:她不说话,而是聪明地凝视。这将专业知识与环境和思想感联系起来。建议与其他物种一样,人类评价是基于协同作用。但是,由于语言的语言方面会限制行动和思维,因此我们也开发了习惯的行为方式。人类通过将实时活动与各种行为相关联来扩展实施力,集体通过这些行为对个人实现价值的方式施加可变程度的控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号