首页> 外文期刊>Affective Computing, IEEE Transactions on >EEG-Based Classification of Music Appraisal Responses Using Time-Frequency Analysis and Familiarity Ratings
【24h】

EEG-Based Classification of Music Appraisal Responses Using Time-Frequency Analysis and Familiarity Ratings

机译:基于EEG的时频分析和熟悉度等级的音乐评价反应分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A time-windowing feature extraction approach based on time-frequency (TF) analysis is adopted here to investigate the time-course of the discrimination between musical appraisal electroencephalogram (EEG) responses, under the parameter of familiarity. An EEG data set, formed by the responses of nine subjects during music listening, along with self-reported ratings of liking and familiarity, is used. Features are extracted from the beta (13-30 Hz) and gamma (30-49 Hz) EEG bands in time windows of various lengths, by employing three TF distributions (spectrogram, Hilbert-Huang spectrum, and Zhao-Atlas-Marks transform). Subsequently, two classifiers ($(k)$-NN and SVM) are used to classify feature vectors in two categories, i.e., "likeâ and "dislike,â under three cases of familiarity, i.e., regardless of familiarity (LD), familiar music (LDF), and unfamiliar music (LDUF). Key findings show that best classification accuracy (CA) is higher and it is achieved earlier in the LDF case {$(91.02 pm 1.45%)$ (7.5-10.5 s)} as compared to the LDUF case {$(87.10 pm 1.84%)$ (10-15 s)}. Additionally, best CAs in LDF and LDUF cases are higher as compared to the general LD case {$(85.28 pm 0.77%)$}. The latter results, along with neurophysiological correlates, are further discussed in the context of the existing literature on the time-course of music-induced affective responses and the role of familiarity.
机译:本文采用基于时频(TF)分析的时间窗特征提取方法,以熟悉的参数为基础,研究音乐鉴定脑电图(EEG)响应之间的区别。使用由9个受试者在听音乐期间的反应以及自我报告的喜好和熟悉程度组成的EEG数据集。通过使用三个TF分布(频谱图,希尔伯特-黄谱和赵阿特拉斯-马克斯变换),从各种长度的时间窗口中的beta(13-30 Hz)和gamma(30-49 Hz)EEG频段中提取特征。 。随后,使用两个分类器($(k)$-NN和SVM)在三种情况下将特征向量分类为“喜欢”和“不喜欢”两类,即在三种情况下,即不考虑熟悉度(LD),熟悉度音乐(LDF)和不熟悉的音乐(LDUF)。主要发现表明,与LDUF案例{$(87.10 pm 1.84%)相比,LDF案例{$(91.02 pm 1.45%)$(7.5-10.5 s)}的最佳分类精度(CA)更高,并且可以更快地实现。 )$(10-15 s)}。此外,LDF和LDUF案例中的最佳CA高于一般LD案例{$(85.28 pm 0.77%)$}。在现有文献的背景下,关于音乐诱发的情感反应的时程以及熟悉的作用,将进一步讨论后者的结果以及神经生理学相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号