首页> 外文期刊>Acta Analytica >Perception and Virtue Reliabilism
【24h】

Perception and Virtue Reliabilism

机译:知觉与美德信赖

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In some recent work, Ernest Sosa rejects the “perceptual model” of rational intuition, according to which intuitive beliefs (e.g., that ) are justified by standing in the appropriate relation to a nondoxastic intellectual experience (a seeming-true, or the like), in much the way that perceptual beliefs are often held to be justified by an appropriate relation to nondoxastic sense experiential states. By extending some of Sosa’s arguments and adding a few of my own, I argue that Sosa is right to reject the perceptual model of intuition, and that we should reject the “perceptual model” of perception as well. Rational intuition and perception should both receive a virtue theoretic (e.g., reliabilist) account, rather than an evidentialist one. To this end, I explicitly argue against the Grounds Principle, which holds that all justified beliefs must be based on some adequate reason, or ground.
机译:在最近的一些著作中,欧内斯特·索萨(Ernest Sosa)拒绝了理性直觉的“知觉模型”,根据该模型,直觉的信念(例如)通过与非固定的智力经验(看似真实的事物)处于适当的关系而被证明是合理的。 ,在很大程度上,通常通过与非静态感觉体验状态的适当关系来保持知觉信念的合理性。通过扩展一些Sosa的论点并添加一些我自己的论点,我认为Sosa拒绝直觉的感知模型是正确的,我们也应该拒绝感知的“感知模型”。理性的直觉和知觉都应该接受美德理论上的(例如信赖主义者)的说明,而不是证据主义上的说明。为此,我明确反对“基本原则”,该原则认为所有合理的信念都必须基于某种适当的理由或根据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号