Rate control was more cost-effective than rhythm control in persistent atrial fibrillation

David Newman MD

首页> 外文期刊>ACP Journal Culb >Rate control was more cost-effective than rhythm control in persistent atrial fibrillation

【24h】

Rate control was more cost-effective than rhythm control in persistent atrial fibrillation

机译：在持续性房颤中，心律控制比心律控制更具成本效益

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《ACP Journal Culb》 |2005年第2期|p.00000053-00000053|共1页
作者
David Newman MD;
展开▼
作者单位

University of TorontoToronto, Ontario, Canada;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Comparison of the rhythm control treatment strategy versus the rate control strategy in patients with permanent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - a pilot study of Cardiac Resynchronization in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (Pilot-CRAfT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J] . Jan Ciszewski, Aleksander Maciag, Ilona Kowalik, Trials . 2014,第1期

机译：永久性或长期性持续性心房颤动和心力衰竭患者接受心脏再同步治疗的心律控制治疗策略与心率控制策略的比较-心房颤动试验中心脏再同步的先导研究（Pilot-CRAfT）：研究方案用于随机对照试验
2. Rhythm control should be better for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure--rhythm control vs. rate control: which is better in the management of atrial fibrillation? (Rhythm-side). [J] . Kurita T, Motoki K, Yasuoka R, Circulation journal . 2011,第4期

机译：心律控制对心律失常患者的控制应该更好—心律控制与心率控制：哪一种在房颤的管理中更好？（节奏方面）。
3. Rhythm Control Should Be Better for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure – Rhythm Control vs. Rate Control: Which Is Better in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation? (Rhythm-Side) – [J] . Takashi Kurita, Koichiro Motoki, Ryobun Yasuoka, Circulation journal . 2011,第4期

机译：心房颤动和心力衰竭患者的心律控制应该更好—心律控制与心律控制：心房颤动的管理中哪个更好？（节奏端）–
4. A new method to assess sinus rhythm maintenance likelihood before electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation [C] . Alcaraz R., Rieta J.J. Computers in Cardiology, 2007 . 2007

机译：一种评估持续性房颤电复律前窦性心律维持可能性的新方法
5. Arrhythmia Management: Control of Alternans & VIEgram for Analysis and Visualization of Electrograms to Aid Atrial Fibrillation Treatment [D] . Thakare, Sanket Yograj. 2020

机译：心律失常管理：控制备用图和偏振图的控制，用于辅助心房颤动治疗的电子图谱
6. Comparison of the rhythm control treatment strategy versus the rate control strategy in patients with permanent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - a pilot study of Cardiac Resynchronization in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (Pilot-CRAfT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [O] . Jan Ciszewski, Aleksander Maciag, Ilona Kowalik, 2014

机译：永久性或长期性持续性心房颤动和心力衰竭患者接受心脏再同步治疗的节律控制策略与速率控制策略的比较-心房颤动试验中心脏再同步的先导研究（Pilot-CRAfT）：研究方案用于随机对照试验

Rate control was more cost-effective than rhythm control in persistent atrial fibrillation

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅