...
首页> 外文期刊>ACP Journal Club >Review: Mifepristone is more effective for emergency contraception than levonorgestrel
【24h】

Review: Mifepristone is more effective for emergency contraception than levonorgestrel

机译:评论:米非司酮比左炔诺孕酮对紧急避孕药更有效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

How do emergency contraception (EC) methods compare for effectiveness and side effects?nnReview scopennStudies selected compared an EC intervention with a different EC intervention, a different dose or regimen of the same drug, or placebo or no treatment in women with regular menses requesting EC after unprotected intercourse. Outcomes were pregnancy, side effects, and timing of subsequent menses. nnReview methodsnnCochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Biosis/EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Popline, CINAHL, LILACs, Chinese biomedical databases, World Health Organization EC database, Princeton University EC website, and reference lists (to Dec 2006) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that had < 20% loss to follow-up. Drug companies and experts were consulted. 81 RCTs (n = 45 842) met the selection criteria. 22 trials reported adequate allocation concealment, and 19 trials were double-blind.
机译:紧急避孕(EC)方法如何比较疗效和副作用?nn审查范围nn选择的研究比较了患有常规月经并要求EC的女性将EC干预与其他EC干预,不同剂量或疗程的相同药物,安慰剂或未进行治疗在无保护的性交之后。结果是怀孕,副作用和随后的月经来潮。 nn审查方法nn搜索随机对照试验中央登记册,PubMed,Biosis / EMBASE / Excerpta Medica,Popline,CINAHL,LILAC,中国生物医学数据库,世界卫生组织EC数据库,普林斯顿大学EC网站和参考文献列表(至2006年12月)。随访损失小于20%的对照试验(RCT)。咨询了制药公司和专家。 81个RCT(n = 45842)符合选择标准。 22项试验报告了足够的分配隐藏,19项试验是双盲的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《ACP Journal Club》 |2008年第4期|p.9-9|共1页
  • 作者

    Jeff Andrews MD;

  • 作者单位

    Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, Tennessee, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号