...
首页> 外文期刊>ACI Structural Journal >Use of CFRP/CFCC Reinforcement in Prestressed Concrete Box-Beam Bridges
【24h】

Use of CFRP/CFCC Reinforcement in Prestressed Concrete Box-Beam Bridges

机译:CFRP / CFCC钢筋在预应力混凝土箱梁桥中的使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents the results of an experimental investigation on the flexural response of two identical box-beam bridge 'models reinforced and prestressed with different types of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) tendons/strands. The first box-beam bridge model BBD-I was reinforced and prestressed using CFRPDCI tendons, while the second bridge model BBC-I was reinforced and prestressed using carbon fiber composite cable (CFCC) strands. Each box-beam bridge model consisted of two precast prestressed box beams placed adjacent to each other and a CFRP/CFCC reinforced deck slab. The two box beams of each bridge model were prestressed using seven pretensioning tendons/strands and consisted off our transverse diaphragms for transverse post-tensioning. Each box-beam bridge model was also prestressed using 12 longitudinal and four transverse unbonded post-tensioning tendons/strands. The changes in pretensioning forces during and after casting the box beams, ultimate loads and modes of failure, deflections, post-tensioning forces, strains, and energy ratios of both bridge models are presented in this paper. The average values of the measured transfer lengths of 9.5 mm (0.37 in.) diameter CFRP-DCI tendons and 12.5 mm (0.49 in.) diameter CFCC strands were measured as 27.4 times and 22.4 times the nominal strand diameter, respectiyely. As expected, both bridge models experienced similar failure modes, that is, the failure was initiated by the crushing of concrete in the compression zone followed by the immediate rupture of prestressing tendons/strands. Moreover, it was observed that the ultimate strength of Bridge Model BBD-I was higher and the energy ratio for the same was lower than that of Bridge Model BBC-I. However, the longitudinal unbonded post-tensioning tendons/strands of the two bridge models remained intact even after the complete collapse of the bridge models. In general, both Bridge Models BBD-I and BBC-I experienced identical flexural behavior, especially the cracking load, mode of failure, and variation in post-tensioning forces.
机译:本文介绍了对两种不同类型的碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)筋/绞线增强和预应力的相同箱梁桥模型的挠曲响应的实验研究结果。第一个箱梁桥模型BBD-I使用CFRPDCI筋进行了加固和预应力,而第二个桥模型BBC-I使用碳纤维复合电缆(CFCC)进行了加固和预应力。每个箱梁桥模型均由两个彼此相邻放置的预制预应力箱梁和一个CFRP / CFCC加固甲板平板组成。每个桥梁模型的两个箱形梁都使用7条预应力筋/绞线进行预应力,并由我们的横向隔板组成,用于横向后张应力。每个箱梁桥模型也使用12条纵向和4条横向无粘结后张预应力筋/钢绞线进行预应力。本文介绍了在箱形梁浇筑过程中和之后的预紧力变化,极限载荷和破坏模式,挠度,后拉力,应变以及两种桥梁模型的能量比。分别测得直径为9.5毫米(0.37英寸)的CFRP-DCI筋和直径为12.5毫米(0.49英寸)的CFCC股线的传输长度的平均值为标称股线直径的27.4倍和22.4倍。正如预期的那样,两个桥梁模型都经历了相似的破坏模式,即破坏是由压缩区内的混凝土压碎引起的,然后预应力筋/钢绞线立即破裂。此外,观察到,BBD-I型桥的极限强度比BBC-I型桥的极限强度更高,并且能量比也更低。然而,即使在桥梁模型完全坍塌之后,两个桥梁模型的纵向未粘结后张预应力筋/钢绞线也保持完整。通常,桥梁模型BBD-I和BBC-I都经历相同的弯曲行为,特别是开裂载荷,破坏模式和后张拉力的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号