首页> 外文期刊>Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal >Analysing accounting discourse: avoiding the “fallacy of internalism”
【24h】

Analysing accounting discourse: avoiding the “fallacy of internalism”

机译:分析会计话语:避免“内部主义谬误”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to elaborate on John B. Thompson's “tripartite approach” for the analysis of mass media communication, highlighting how this methodological framework can help address some of the shortcomings apparent in extant studies on accounting which purport to analyse accounting “texts”. Design/methodology/approach – By way of example, the paper develops a critique of an existing study in accounting that adopts a “textually-oriented” approach to discourse analysis by Gallhofer, Haslam and Roper. This study, which is informed by Fairclough's version of critical discourse analysis (CDA), undertakes an analysis of the letters of submission of two business lobby groups regarding proposed takeovers legislation in New Zealand. A two-stage strategy is developed: first, to review the extant literature which is critical of CDA, and second, to consider whether these criticisms apply to Gallhofer et al. Whilst acknowledging that Gallhofer et al.'s (2001) study is perhaps one of the more comprehensive in the accounting literature, the critique developed in the present paper nevertheless highlights a number of limitations. Based upon this critique, an alternative framework is proposed which allows for a more comprehensive analysis of accounting texts. Findings – The critique of Gallhofer et al.'s study highlights what is arguably an overemphasis on the internal characteristics of text: this is referred to by Thompson as the “fallacy of internalism”. In other words, Gallhofer et al. draw inferences regarding the production of the letters of submission from the texts themselves, and make implicit assumptions about the likely effects of these texts without undertaking any formal analysis of their production or reception, or without paying sufficient attention to the social and historical context of their production or reception. Originality/value – Drawing on Thompson's theory of mass communication and his explication of the hermeneutical conditions of social-historical enquiry, the paper outlines a range of theoretical considerations which are pertinent to researchers interested in studying accounting texts. Moreover, building on these theoretical considerations, the paper delineates a coherent and flexible methodological framework, which, it is hoped, may guide accounting researchers in this area.
机译:目的–本文的目的是阐述约翰B.汤普森(John B. Thompson)的“三方方法”来分析大众传播媒介,强调该方法框架如何帮助解决现存的会计学研究中明显存在的一些缺陷,这些缺陷旨在分析会计学“文本”。设计/方法论/方法–例如,本文对现有的会计研究提出了批评,该研究采用了“基于文本的”方法进行Gallhofer,Haslam和Roper的话语分析。这项研究以Fairclough的批评性话语分析(CDA)版本为基础,对两个企业游说团体就新西兰拟议的收购立法提交的来函进行了分析。制定了两个阶段的策略:首先,回顾对CDA至关重要的现有文献,其次,考虑这些批评是否适用于Gallhofer等。尽管承认Gallhofer等人(2001)的研究可能是会计文献中更全面的研究之一,但本文提出的批评仍然突出了许多局限性。基于这种批评,提出了一种替代框架,该框架允许对会计文本进行更全面的分析。调查结果–对Gallhofer等人的研究的批评强调了对文本内部特征的过分强调:汤普森将其称为“内部主义的谬误”。换句话说,Gallhofer等。从文本本身得出关于提交信的生产方式的推论,并对这些文本的可能影响做出隐含的假设,而无需对它们的产生或接受进行任何形式上的正式分析,或者不对其文本的社会和历史背景进行充分关注生产或接待。原创性/价值–借鉴汤普森的大众传播理论以及他对社会历史研究的解释学条件的阐释,本文概述了与研究会计文本感兴趣的研究人员有关的一系列理论考虑。此外,基于这些理论上的考虑,本文描述了一个连贯而灵活的方法框架,希望可以为这一领域的会计研究人员提供指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号