首页> 外文期刊>Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal >Responsibility and accountability without direct control?: Local education authorities and the seeking of influence in the UK schools sector
【24h】

Responsibility and accountability without direct control?: Local education authorities and the seeking of influence in the UK schools sector

机译:没有直接控制的责任和责任?:地方教育主管部门和寻求在英国学校领域的影响力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose – This paper seeks to extend understanding of how being responsible and accountable for performance impacts on control processes between organisations. Design/methodology/approach – The paper analyses empirical findings gathered from officers of two local education authorities about their control relationships with schools. It provides a Habermasian theoretically informed analysis of these control relationships. Control is studied as the steering processes that occur between organisations in response to regulation from government. Findings – The LEA officers employ the language of influence to conceal ongoing direct forms of control over schools. As the officers attempt to demonstrate their accountability to the Department of Education and Skills, they use communication and information strategically to steer schools towards their ways of thinking. Research limitations/implications – The paper focuses only on the views of LEA officers. Further research is required to ascertain the views of schools and other stakeholders in local education. Practical implications – Where regulatory bodies demand performance accountability from organisations, appropriate control mechanisms are necessary to ensure that organisations work in transparent ways towards regulatory objectives. Originality/value – Steering, responsibility, accountability and control are discussed in an educational context.
机译:目的–本文旨在扩大对绩效对组织之间的控制流程的影响负责和负责的理解。设计/方法/方法-本文分析了从两个地方教育机构的官员那里收集到的关于他们与学校的控制关系的实证结果。它提供了哈贝马斯理论上对这些控制关系的分析。控制是作为组织之间响应政府监管而发生的指导过程而研究的。调查结果– LEA官员运用影响力的语言掩盖了当前对学校的直接控制形式。当军官试图向教育和技能部证明自己的责任时,他们会策略性地使用交流和信息来引导学校朝着自己的思维方式发展。研究的局限性/意义–本文仅关注LEA官员的观点。需要进一步研究以确定学校和其他利益相关者在当地教育中的观点。实际意义–监管机构要求组织执行绩效问责制时,必须采用适当的控制机制,以确保组织以透明的方式实现监管目标。原创性/价值–在教育背景下讨论指导,责任,责任和控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号