首页> 外文期刊>Accounting and finance >Valuation scepticism, liquidity benefits and closed-end fund premiums/discounts: evidence from fair value disclosures
【24h】

Valuation scepticism, liquidity benefits and closed-end fund premiums/discounts: evidence from fair value disclosures

机译:估值怀疑,流动性收益和封闭式基金溢价/折价:公允价值披露的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Closed-end fund investors may view assets valued using level 2 and 3 inputs more sceptically because of the subjectivity of these inputs (valuation scepticism), or these assets could be viewed favourably because they allow small investors to access illiquid securities (liquidity benefit). We find that funds holding level 3 assets have higher value when funds trade at a premium, but lower value when funds trade at a discount. Both of these effects are magnified for funds with higher levels of unrealized appreciation. Our results suggest that liquidity benefit (valuation scepticism) is more important when funds trade at a premium (discount).
机译:由于这些输入的主观性(估值怀疑),封闭式基金投资者可能更倾向于使用第2级和第3级输入来评估资产的价值(对价值的怀疑),或者因为这些资产允许小投资者获得流动性不佳的证券(流动性收益)而受到青睐。我们发现,当基金以溢价交易时,持有第3级资产的资产价值较高,而在折价交易时则价值较低。对于未实现升值水平较高的基金,这两种影响都会被放大。我们的结果表明,当资金溢价交易(折扣)时,流动性收益(估值怀疑)更为重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号