首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >Value judgments
【24h】

Value judgments

机译:价值判断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The theoretical requirements of IFRS 3 and IAS 38, the new and revised standards on business combinations and intangible assets respectively, have been well documented (Accountancy, June, p82) but there has been little discussion on how these requirements will be followed in practice. The practical implications will require the acquirer to make judgments in identifying the acquiree's intangible assets and assessing each asset's useful life as well as applying the appropriate intangible valuation methodology. It is also worthwhile highlighting the fact that there are no strict industry benchmarks which can be applied to gauge what proportion of goodwill might be apportioned to intangible assets pursuant to an acquisition. Each and every company will have different intangibles of varying degrees of value. The valuation expert must consider whether the level of intangibles identified appears reasonable in the context of how that company's strengths and weaknesses are perceived in the marketplace.
机译:IFRS 3和IAS 38的理论要求(分别是关于企业合并和无形资产的新标准和经修订的标准)已被详细记录(会计,六月,p82),但很少讨论如何在实践中遵循这些要求。实际影响将要求收购方在确定被收购方的无形资产,评估每项资产的使用寿命以及采用适当的无形评估方法时做出判断。还值得一提的是,没有严格的行业基准可用来衡量根据收购而有多少比例的商誉可分配给无形资产。每家公司将拥有不同程度的价值无形资产。估值专家必须考虑在市场上如何看待公司的优势和劣势,确定无形资产的水平是否合理。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accountancy》 |2004年第1335期|p.86-87|共2页
  • 作者

    Nicholas Anderson;

  • 作者单位

    Gravitas Partners LLP;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 f;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号