The recent case of Baker & O'Reilly v London Bar Company Ltd has confirmed the principle laid down in Minmar (929) Ltd v Khalastchi (see Accountancy, July 2011, p81) concerning the appointment of an administrator using the out of court procedure in Sch B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986. In Minmar, the court held that a provision in Sch B1 that 'a reference to something done by the directors of a company includes a reference to the same thing done by a majority of the directors of a company' did not mean that a majority of the directors could reach a decision by any means. It remained necessary to comply with the relevant formalities for reaching such a decision.
展开▼
机译:最近的Baker&O'Reilly诉London Bar Company Ltd一案已确认了Minmar(929)Ltd诉Khalastchi(见Accountancy,2011年7月,第81页)关于使用法院外程序任命管理人的原则。 1986年《破产法》附表B1。在明马市,法院裁定,附表B1中的规定“对公司董事所做的事情的提述包括对公司多数董事所作的相同事情的提述。 ”并不意味着多数董事可以通过任何方式做出决定。仍然有必要遵守相关手续以做出此决定。
展开▼