首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >GAMBLING ON AN APPEAL
【24h】

GAMBLING ON AN APPEAL

机译:赌博上诉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

If employees appeal against the outcome of disciplinary proceedings, will they risk the possibility of an even greater penalty being imposed? That was the question at the centre of McMillan v Airedale NHS Foundation Trust [2013] EWHC 1504 (QB). Miss McMillan, a doctor, had appealed against a disciplinary panel's decision to give her a final written warning. She was informed that the appeal would take the form of a full rehearing rather than just a review of the original decision. The appeal panel would consider all the evidence and reach its own conclusions. If the outcome was that the allegations were unfounded, that would be the end of the matter. If the panel found the allegations substantiated, it would have to consider what, if any, disciplinary action should be taken.
机译:如果员工对纪律处分程序的结果提出上诉,他们会冒险施加更大的罚款吗?这是McMillan诉Airedale NHS基金会信托[2013] EWHC 1504(QB)的核心问题。医生麦克米伦小姐已对纪律小组做出的最终书面警告提出上诉。她被告知,上诉将采取全面排练的形式,而不仅仅是对原始决定的审查。上诉小组将考虑所有证据并得出自己的结论。如果结果是指控没有根据,那将是事情的结局。如果小组认为指控成立,则必须考虑采取什么纪律处分。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accountancy》 |2014年第1453期|71-71|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号