首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >POST-BEPS WORLD
【24h】

POST-BEPS WORLD

机译:事后世界

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The OECD's BEPS project was no mean feat but the real challenge now is implementation as BEPS Phase 2 kicks in, considering the complexity ahead and the different weight the various Actions carry. Some are an agreement to a minimum standard such as a commitment to implementing country-by-country reporting (CBCR) and improved dispute resolution; some require changes to existing rules (Model Treaty and the Transfer Pricing Guidelines); some call for common approaches (hybrid mismatches and interest deductions); others represent best practice - relating to controlled foreign company (CFC) rules or disclosure of tax planning; and one is an agreement to further research the effect of the digital economy. There are two clear risks - countries could now act unilaterally, as in the case of the UK's diverted profits tax rules, or they might start to back off and cherry pick only what suits them when faced with the potential downsides for their home-based multinationals or their tax base. Either approach would lead to increased complexity and uncertainty in international taxation, more disputes and loss of faith in the whole process.
机译:经合组织的BEPS项目绝非易事,但现在真正的挑战是BEPS第二阶段启动时的实施,要考虑到未来的复杂性和各项行动的不同权重。有些协议是关于最低标准的协议,例如承诺执行国别报告(CBCR)和改善争端解决;有些要求改变现有规则(《示范条约》和《转让定价准则》);一些人呼吁采取共同的做法(混合错配和扣除利息);其他代表最佳实践-与受控外国公司(CFC)规则或税务计划披露有关;一个协议是进一步研究数字经济的影响。存在两个明显的风险-各国现在可以单方面采取行动,例如在英国改变利得税规则的情况下,否则它们可能会开始退缩,只在面对本土跨国公司的潜在不利因素时才选择适合自己的方案或其税基。这两种方法都会导致国际税收的复杂性和不确定性增加,在整个过程中产生更多争端和丧失信心。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accountancy》 |2015年第1467期|38-39|共2页
  • 作者

    Chris Morgan;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号