首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >CONFISCATION ORDER DOES NOT IMPACT ON DISCOVERY ASSESSMENT
【24h】

CONFISCATION ORDER DOES NOT IMPACT ON DISCOVERY ASSESSMENT

机译:没收令不影响发现评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Martin v Revenue and Customs [2015] UKUT 161 (TCC), Mr Martin was issued with a confiscation order in February 2009 by the Crown Court under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) in relation to offences of fraudulently using a trademark. Soon after this, HMRC wrote to Martin to notify him that it was starting an investigation into his tax affairs. Following delays and non-engagement by Martin, HMRC issued protective discovery assessments under the Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA 1970), s29 for the tax years 2000-01 to 2007-08. The assessments were based on best judgment. On appeal, Martin argued that his tax liability had, as a matter of law (and relying on R & C Commrs v Crossman [2008] 1 All ER 483), been resolved with the confiscation order. The FTT rejected this argument and said the assessments should stand.
机译:在Martin v Revenue and Customs [2015] UKUT 161(TCC)一案中,Martin先生于2009年2月被英国最高法院根据《 2002年犯罪收益法》(POCA 2002)发出没收令,涉及欺诈性使用商标的罪行。此后不久,英国税务与海关总署(HMRC)致信马丁(Martin),他开始对他的税务事务进行调查。在Martin的延误和不参与之后,HMRC根据1970年税收管理法(TMA 1970),在2000-01至2007-08纳税年度的第29条中发布了保护性发现评估。评估基于最佳判断。马丁在上诉中辩称,根据法律,他的应纳税额(并依据R&C Commrs v Crossman [2008] 1 All ER 483)已通过没收令得以解决。 FTT拒绝了这一论点,并表示评估应该成立。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accountancy》 |2015年第1465期|24-25|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号