...
首页> 外文期刊>Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance >Orphan Papers and Ghostwriting: The Case against the ICMJE Criterion of Authorship
【24h】

Orphan Papers and Ghostwriting: The Case against the ICMJE Criterion of Authorship

机译:孤儿论文和代笔:反对ICMJE作者标准的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Although popular, I argue that the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) account of authorship is flawed. It inadvertently allows for practices that it was designed to prevent. In addition, it creates a new category of authorless papers—orphan papers. The original World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) criterion is preferable.
机译:尽管很受欢迎,但我认为国际医学杂志编辑委员会(ICMJE)的作者身份报告存在缺陷。它不经意间允许采取旨在防止的做法。此外,它创建了一个新的无作者论文类别-孤儿论文。最初的世界医学编辑协会(WAME)标准是可取的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号